Fiore v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
Filing
200
ORDER granting 198 The Defendant, Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company's Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Plaintiffs' First Request for Admissions. The Defendant has up to and including March 23, 2012, to serve its responses to the Plaintiffs first request for admissions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 3/19/2012. (LMH)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
FORT MYERS DIVISION
WAYNE FIORE, WARNER N.
ELKINS, SCOTT WENDELL,
RICHARD ANDERSON, ERIK
SHERMAN, MISTY SANCHEZ,
BELA HALMI, MICHAEL
HONDLIK, MICHAEL HOFFMAN,
JUSTIN SPURLOCK,
CHRISTOPHER TIEDEMANN,
CASEY HAMLIN, ERIC CRONCE
and CHARLES BOGGS, on his own
behalf and others similarly situated
Plaintiffs,
V.
Case No: 2:09-CV-843-FtM-29SPC
GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER
COMPANY
Defendant.
___________________________________/
ORDER
This matter comes before the Court on the Defendant, Goodyear Tire and Rubber
Company's Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Plaintiffs' First Request
for Admissions (Doc. #198) filed on March 19, 2012. The Defendant states that its counsel have
been working diligently to prepare its response to Plaintiff’s First Request for Admissions,
however, due to a recent death in the family undersigned counsel requires additional time to
finalize Goodyear’s response.
Pursuant to M.D. Fla. Local Rule 3.01(g), the Defendant
1
conferred with Plaintiff’s Counsel who does not oppose the requested relief. As such, the Court
finds good cause to grant the Motion.
Accordingly, it is now
ORDERED:
The Defendant, Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company's Unopposed Motion for
Enlargement of Time to Respond to Plaintiffs' First Request for Admissions (Doc. #198) is
GRANTED. The Defendant has up to and including March 23, 2012, to serve its responses to
the Plaintiff’s first request for admissions.
DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida this 19th Day of March, 2012.
Copies: All Parties of Record
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?