Fiore v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company

Filing 200

ORDER granting 198 The Defendant, Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company's Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Plaintiffs' First Request for Admissions. The Defendant has up to and including March 23, 2012, to serve its responses to the Plaintiffs first request for admissions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 3/19/2012. (LMH)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION WAYNE FIORE, WARNER N. ELKINS, SCOTT WENDELL, RICHARD ANDERSON, ERIK SHERMAN, MISTY SANCHEZ, BELA HALMI, MICHAEL HONDLIK, MICHAEL HOFFMAN, JUSTIN SPURLOCK, CHRISTOPHER TIEDEMANN, CASEY HAMLIN, ERIC CRONCE and CHARLES BOGGS, on his own behalf and others similarly situated Plaintiffs, V. Case No: 2:09-CV-843-FtM-29SPC GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY Defendant. ___________________________________/ ORDER This matter comes before the Court on the Defendant, Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company's Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Plaintiffs' First Request for Admissions (Doc. #198) filed on March 19, 2012. The Defendant states that its counsel have been working diligently to prepare its response to Plaintiff’s First Request for Admissions, however, due to a recent death in the family undersigned counsel requires additional time to finalize Goodyear’s response. Pursuant to M.D. Fla. Local Rule 3.01(g), the Defendant 1 conferred with Plaintiff’s Counsel who does not oppose the requested relief. As such, the Court finds good cause to grant the Motion. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: The Defendant, Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company's Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Plaintiffs' First Request for Admissions (Doc. #198) is GRANTED. The Defendant has up to and including March 23, 2012, to serve its responses to the Plaintiff’s first request for admissions. DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida this 19th Day of March, 2012. Copies: All Parties of Record 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?