Fiore v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company

Filing 211

OPINION AND ORDER granting 208 Motion to Approve Settlement; approving settlement as fair and reasonable; adopting and incorporating 209 Report and Recommendations. The Clerk shall enter judgment dismissing the case with prejudice except as prov ided by the Settlement Agreement, terminate all motions and deadlines (terminating 153 Motion to accept as timely consents to join; terminating 159 Motion for leave to file; terminating 166 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; terminating 185 Report and Recommendations), and close the file. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 5/14/2012. (RKR)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION WAYNE FIORE, on his own behalf and others similarly situated, and WARNER N. ELKINS, CHARLES BOGGS, ERIC CRONCE, BRENDA D. SMITH, CASEY HAMLIN, CHRISTOPHER TIEDEMANN, SCOTT WANDELL, JAMES BETTS, JUSTIN SPURLOCK, MICHAEL HOFFMAN, RICHARD ANDERSON, MICHAEL HONDLIK, SCOTT DUNN, BELA HALMI, MISTY SANCHEZ, ERIK SHERMAN, APOLO PLATON, as optin plaintiffs, Plaintiffs, vs. Case No. 2:09-cv-843-FtM-29SPC GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, an Ohio Corporation, Defendant. ___________________________________ OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on consideration of the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. #209), filed May 9, 2012, recommending that the Joint Motion to Approve Settlement (Doc. #208) be granted, the settlement be approved as fair and reasonable, and the case be dismissed. The parties filed a Joint Notice of No Objection (Doc. #210) on May 10, 2012. After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject or modify the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. 636(b)(1); 28 U.S.C. § Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1112 (1983). In the absence of specific objections, there is no requirement that a district judge review factual findings de novo, Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993), and the court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings and recommendations. 636(b)(1)(C). 28 U.S.C. § The district judge reviews legal conclusions de novo, even in the absence of an objection. See Cooper-Houston v. Southern Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994); Castro Bobadilla v. Reno, 826 F. Supp. 1428, 1431-32 (S.D. Fla. 1993), aff’d, 28 F.3d 116 (11th Cir. 1994) (Table). After conducting an independent examination of the file and upon due consideration of the Report and Recommendation, the Court accepts the Report and Recommendation of the magistrate judge. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. #209) is hereby adopted and the findings incorporated herein. 2. The Joint Motion to Approve Settlement (Doc. #208) is GRANTED and the Settlement Agreement (Doc. #208-1) is approved as fair and reasonable. -2- 3. The Clerk shall enter judgment dismissing the case with prejudice, except as provided by the Settlement Agreement, terminate all deadlines and motions, and close the file. DONE AND ORDERED at Fort Myers, Florida, this May, 2012. Copies: Hon. Sheri Polster Chappell United States Magistrate Judge Counsel of Record Unrepresented parties -3- 14th day of

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?