Anderson v. City of Naples et al

Filing 43

ORDER denying 40 Plaintiff's Renewed Motion to Strike Defendants' Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendants' Cross Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 10/27/2010. (LMH)

Anderson v. City of Naples et al

Doc. 43

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION MICHAEL ANDERSON, Plaintiff, -vsCITY OF NAPLES; NAPLES POLICE DEPARTMENT; RALPH ANTHONY, Defendants. ______________________________________ ORDER This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff's Renewed Motion to Strike Defendants' Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendants' Cross Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #40) filed on October 26, 2010. On October 25, 2010, this Court accepted the filing of Defendants' Amended Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #36) and separate Cross Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #37) filed on October 22, 2010. Thus, Plaintiff's Motion is due to be denied. Plaintiff is reminded that he has 14 days from the date of service of Defendants' Cross Motion for Summary Judgment to file his opposition to the motion with the Court in a document not more than 20 pages in length. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: Plaintiff's Renewed Motion to Strike Defendants' Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendants' Cross Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #40) is DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED at Fort Myers, Florida, this 27th day of October, 2010. Case No. 2:10-cv-111-FtM-36SPC

Copies: All Parties of Record

Dockets.Justia.com