Comerica Bank v. Hill et al

Filing 16

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 15 The Plaintiff, Comerica Bank and the Defendant Andrew Hill, et. al.'s Joint Motion to Defer Case Management Conference/Deadlines Pending Disposition of Motion to Compel Arbitration and/or to Permi t Telephonic Participation at the Case Management Conference. The Plaintiff, Comerica Bank and the Defendant Andrew Hill, et. al.'s Joint Motion to Defer Case Management Conference/ Deadlines Pending Disposition of Motion to Compel Arbitration is DENIED. The Plaintiff, Comerica Bank and the Defendant Andrew Hill, et. al.'s Joint Motion to Permit Telephonic Participation at the Case Management Conference is GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 4/26/2010. (LMH)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION COMERICA BANK, Plaintiff, -vsANDREW HILL; ANDREW HILL INVESTMENTS ADVISORS, INC.; JENNIFER FIGURELLI, Defendants. _____________________________________/ Case No. 2:10-cv-126-FtM-29SPC ORDER This matter comes before the Court on the Plaintiff, Comerica Bank and the Defendant Andrew Hill, et. al.'s Joint Motion to Defer Case Management Conference/Deadlines Pending Disposition of Motion to Compel Arbitration and/or to Permit Telephonic Participation at the Case Management Conference (Doc. #15) filed on April 20, 2010. The Parties move the Court to stay the meeting and preparation of the Case Management Report pending a ruling on the Motion to Dismiss or Compel Arbitration (Doc. # 11) filed on March 18, 2010. As the Parties noted in their Joint Motion, it is not the general practice of the Court to stay the Case Management Conference pending a ruling on a dispositive motion. M.D. Fla. Local Rule 3.05(c)(2)(B). The Court does not find good cause to change that general practice in this case. Thus, the Motion to Stay Case Management Conference is due to be denied. The Parties also move the Court to allow the Case Management Conference to proceed telephonically. The Court as a general practice encourages the use of telephonic conferences where feasible. In this case, good cause exists to grant the Motion to appear via telephone for the Case Management Conference. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: The Plaintiff, Comerica Bank and the Defendant Andrew Hill, et. al.'s Joint Motion to Defer Case Management Conference/ Deadlines Pending Disposition of Motion to Compel Arbitration and/or to Permit Telephonic Participation at the Case Management Conference (Doc. #15) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. (1) The Plaintiff, Comerica Bank and the Defendant Andrew Hill, et. al.'s Joint Motion to Defer Case Management Conference/ Deadlines Pending Disposition of Motion to Compel Arbitration is DENIED. (2) The Plaintiff, Comerica Bank and the Defendant Andrew Hill, et. al.'s Joint Motion to Permit Telephonic Participation at the Case Management Conference is GRANTED. DONE AND ORDERED at Fort Myers, Florida, this 26th day of April, 2010. Copies: All Parties of Record -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?