Surloff v. Paramount Drywall, Inc. et al

Filing 27

ORDER. The parties shall have up to and including DECEMBER 22, 2010 to submit their settlement documentation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 12/13/2010. (LMH)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION ALAN SURLOFF, on his own behalf and others similarly situated, Plaintiff, -vsPARAMOUNT DRYWALL, INC., a Florida Corporation; PARAMOUNT STUCCO, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, Defendants. ______________________________________ ORDER This matter comes before the Court on the Notice of Settlement (Doc. #25) filed on December 7, 2010. The parties indicate a settlement has been reached with respect to the Plaintiff=s claims. The parties are required to provide the Court with sufficient information regarding the settlement in order for the Court to determine whether the settlement is a Afair and reasonable resolution of a bona fide dispute@ over FLSA issues. Lynn=s Food Stores, Inc. v. United States, 679 F.2d 1350, 1354-55 (11th Cir. 1982). Therefore, the parties Case No. 2:10-cv-305-FtM-29SPC

should submit a Joint Motion to Approve the Settlement with the settlement documents. The information should include a copy of the settlement agreement signed by all parties, a brief description of the terms of the settlement, the number of hours and lost wages originally claimed by the Plaintiff and whether or not the Plaintiffs claims were settled by compromise.

With regard to attorney=s fees, the Court recognizes the ruling in Bonetti v. Embarq. Mgmt. Co., 2009 WL 2371407 (M.D. Fla. Aug. 2009)1. Counsel should indicate whether the settlement of the attorney=s fees was independent and in seriatim in order to forego the necessity to file copies of billing records with their settlement documentation. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: The parties shall have up to and including DECEMBER 22, 2010 to submit their settlement documentation..

Copies: All parties of record

The Bonetti Court held if the Plaintiff=s recovery and attorney=s fees were settled independently of the Plaintiff=s claims, there would be no need to file the attorney=s billing records unless the fees were out of line compared with the settlement agreement. Thus, the award of attorney=s fees and costs would no longer require approval using the lodestar approach.
2

1