Berlinger et al v. Wells Fargo, N.A. as Successor to Wachovia Bank, N.A.
Filing
169
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 166 Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion to Seal. See Order for further instructions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carol Mirando on 6/16/2014. (BLW)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
FORT MYERS DIVISION
STACEY SUE BERLINGER, as
beneficiaries to Rosa B. Schweiker
Trust and all of its related trusts, also
known as STACEY BERLINGER
O'CONNOR, BRIAN BRUCE
BERLINGER,
Plaintiffs,
v.
Case No: 2:11-cv-459-FtM-29CM
WELLS FARGO, N.A., AS
SUCCESSOR TO WACHOVIA BANK,
N.A., as Corporate Trustee to the
Rosa B. Schweiker Trust, and all of its
related trusts,
Defendant.
ORDER
Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion to Seal (Doc. 166) filed on
June 11, 2014. Plaintiffs are requesting the Court enter an order sealing documents
to be filed in connection with several upcoming motions. Plaintiffs provide that the
documents must be sealed in order to protect the disclosure of certain confidential
policies and procedures of the Defendant Wells Fargo, identifying the documents to
be sealed as:
(a)
Notice of Filing Deposition of Linda La Vay, dated May 25, 2014;
(b)
Deposition of Linda La Vay, dated May 15, 2014;
(c)
Notice of Filing Deposition of Thomas Craven, dated May 15, 2014;
(d)
Deposition of Thomas Craven, dated May 14, 2014;
(e)
Notice of Filing of Deposition of Bernard Destafney, dated May 16, 2014;
(f)
Deposition of Bernard Destafney, dated May 16, 2014; and
(g)
Motion to Compel Production of Documents Found in Privilege Log or,
in the alternative, an In Camera Inspection of Documents Found in
Privilege Log.
Doc. 166 at ¶ 1(a)-(g). Plaintiffs have conferred with Wells Fargo pursuant to Local
Rule 3.01(g), and represents that Wells Fargo does not oppose the relief requested.
Pursuant to Local Rule 1.09(a),
[u]nless filing under seal is authorized by statute, rule, or order, a party
seeking to file under seal any paper or other matter in any civil case
shall file and serve a motion, the title of which includes the words
“Motion to Seal” and which includes (i) an identification and description
of each proposed for sealing; (ii) the reason that filing each item is
necessary; (iii) the reason that sealing each item is necessary; (iv) the
reason that a means other than sealing is unavailable or unsatisfactory
to preserve the interest advanced by the movant in support of the seal;
(v) a statement of the proposed duration of the seal; and (vi) a
memorandum of legal authority supporting the seal. The movant shall
not file or otherwise tender to the Clerk any item proposed for sealing
unless the Court has granted the motion required by this section.
M.D. Fla. Rule 1.09(a).
In this case, Plaintiffs have not sufficiently identified and described all of the
documents proposed for sealing and sufficiently explained that filing the documents
under seal is necessary. Specifically, Plaintiffs do not explain why a notice of filing
deposition would reveal Defendant’s confidential information. Further, a redacted
version of a motion to compel may be filed in the public record and an unredacted
version under seal. Thus, the Motion to Seal will be granted in part and denied in
part as set forth below.
-2-
ACCORDINGLY, it is hereby
ORDERED:
1.
Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion to Seal (Doc. 166) is GRANTED in part
and DENIED in part.
2.
Upon receipt, the Clerk shall file the following documents, offered by
Plaintiffs, under seal:
(a)
(b)
Deposition of Thomas Craven, dated May 14, 2014;
(c)
Deposition of Bernard Destafney, dated May 16, 2014; and
(d)
3.
Deposition of Linda La Vay, dated May 15, 2014;
Motion to Compel Production of Documents Found in Privilege
Log or, in the alternative, an In Camera Inspection of Documents
Found in Privilege Log.
Plaintiffs shall file a redacted version of the motion to compel in
CM/ECF and provide the Court with the unredacted version to be placed under seal.
DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on this 16th day of June, 2014.
Copies:
Counsel of record
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?