Wilson v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank et al

Filing 7

OPINION AND ORDER adopting and incorporating 6 Report and Recommendations. The Clerk shall enter judgment dismissing the case without prejudice for failure to prosecute, terminate all deadlines and motions, and close the file. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 6/11/2012. (RKR)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION ROBERT WM. WILSON, Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 2:11-cv-607-FtM-29SPC J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, as Trustee of Security National Mortgage Loan Trust 2001-1, SECURITY NATIONAL SERVICING CORPORATION, GIRARD SAVINGS BANK, CITIBANK, ONTRA, INC., BRISTOL OAKS, ALASKA SEABOARD, FLORIDA DEFAULT LAW GROUP, and their named/senior partners formerly known as ECHEVARRIA, CODILIS & STAWIARSKI, ROGER BEAR, 304212, JOSEPH RUSHING, 28365, WILLIAM HUFFMAN, 31084, THOMAS M. MOON, 386588, BARBARA LEON, 582115, ERIC T. MAGOON, 562300, J. ANTHONY VAN NESS, 391832, CHRISTINA PAPPAS, 715589, KIERSTEN JENSEN, 667854, ROBERT S. KAHANE, 946850, JR. ROBERT C. HILL, 241891, JULIE H. SCHEIDTER, 0434817, THOMAS J. WOHL, 0022131, CHARLIE GREEN, Clerk of the Circuit, JR. Court, OFFICE OF COURT ADMINISTRATION, 20th Judicial Circuit, FRANCIS LYNN GERALD, 111328, in his individual capacity, Defendants. ___________________________________ OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on consideration of the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. #6), filed May 11, 2012, recommending that the action be dismissed for failure to prosecute. No objections have been filed and the time to do so has expired. After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject or modify the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. 636(b)(1); 28 U.S.C. § Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1112 (1983). In the absence of specific objections, there is no requirement that a district judge review factual findings de novo, Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993), and the court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings and recommendations. 636(b)(1)(C). 28 U.S.C. § The district judge reviews legal conclusions de novo, even in the absence of an objection. See Cooper-Houston v. Southern Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994); Castro Bobadilla v. Reno, 826 F. Supp. 1428, 1431-32 (S.D. Fla. 1993), aff’d, 28 F.3d 116 (11th Cir. 1994) (Table). After conducting an independent examination of the file and upon due consideration of the Report and Recommendation, the Court accepts the Report and Recommendation of the magistrate judge. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. #6) is hereby adopted and the findings incorporated herein. -2- 2. The Clerk shall enter judgment dismissing the case without prejudice for failure to prosecute, terminate all deadlines and motions, and close the file. DONE AND ORDERED at Fort Myers, Florida, this June, 2012. Copies: Hon. Sheri Polster Chappell United States Magistrate Judge Counsel of Record Unrepresented parties -3- 11th day of

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?