Arthrex, Inc. v. Parcus Medical, LLC

Filing 30

ORDER granting 28 Joint Motion for Leave to Meet by Telephone to Prepare Case Management Report. (LMH)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION ARTHREX INC.,, Plaintiff, -vs- Case No. 2:11-cv-694-FtM-29SPC PARCUS MEDICAL, LLC, Defendant. ______________________________________ ORDER This matter comes before the Court on Joint Motion for Leave to Meet by Telephone to Prepare Case Management Report (Doc. #28) filed on March 13, 2012. The parties move the court to allow the parties to meet telephonically to prepare the Case Management Report. The use of telephonic hearings an conferences are encouraged by the Court where they are feasible. Fischer v. District School Bd. Of Collier County, 2010 WL 3522215 *1 (M.D. Fla. Sept. 7, 2010). Plaintiff’s attorneys are located in Naples, Florida and Birmingham, Michigan. Defendant’s attorneys are located in West Palm Beach, Florida and Boston, Massachusetts. The parties argue that requiring them to travel to Florida to prepare the Case Management Report would create undue hardship on them. A similar burden existed in Fischer where this court found that requiring a plaintiff to travel from Arizona to Florida to prepare a case management report constituted an undue hardship on the parties. Id. Because of this hardship, this court found a telephonic meeting feasible because it would reduce the hardship on the involved parties. Id. Allowing the parties in this action to meet via telephone would reduce the parties’ hardships just as in Fischer. As such, the use of a telephonic will be granted. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: Joint Motion for Leave to Meet by Telephone to Prepare Case Management Report (Doc. #28) is GRANTED. DONE AND ORDERED at Fort Myers, Florida, this Copies: All Parties of Record -2- 20th day of March, 2012.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?