Pantoja v. Edward Zengel & Son Express, Inc.

Filing 3

ORDER. The Courts February 25, 2011 Order 2 is hereby vacated. Plaintiff's counsel Sina Negahbani shall have up to and including March 11, 2011 to file a response to the pending Motion to Quash (Doc. #1). The Court will thereafter rule on the Motion in due course. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 3/2/2011. (LMH)

Download PDF
v. Pantoja et al Doc. 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION MANUEL PANTOJA, individually and on behalf of all similarly situated plan participant/beneficiary Plaintiff, -vsEDWARD ZENGEL & SONS EXPRESS, Inc., MARIE ZENGEL Defendants. ______________________________________ Case No. 2:11-mc-111-FtM-29SPC ORDER This matter comes before the Court sua sponte. The Court notes that counsel for Plaintiff Manuel Pantoja, Sina Negahbani, is not admitted to practice in the Middle District of Florida. That being the case, he may not file any pleadings in this matter until he is sworn in. Mr. Negahbani is set to be sworn in to this Court on Monday, March 7, 2011. Therefore, his obligation to comply with the Court's previous Order (Doc. #2) directing him to file a response to the pending Motion to Quash by March 3, 2011 at 5:00pm is vacated. Plaintiff shall have up to and including March 11, 2011 to file his response. In the meantime, the Parties are encouraged to continue to meet and confer in an effort to resolve the issues raised in the Motion to Quash. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: The Court's February 25, 2011 Order (Doc. #2) is hereby vacated. Plaintiff's counsel Sina Negahbani shall have up to and including March 11, 2011 to file a response to the pending Motion Dockets.Justia.com to Quash (Doc. #1). The Court will thereafter rule on the Motion in due course. DONE AND ORDERED at Fort Myers, Florida, this 2nd day of March, 2011. Copies: All Parties of Record

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?