Tufano v. Bush et al

Filing 29

ORDER denying as moot Defendant's request for a protective order regarding the content of Bush's text messages sent and received from his cellular telephone on March 22, 2012 is denied as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 9/4/2012. (LMF)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION ANTHONY B. TUFANO, Plaintiff, v. Case No: 2:12-cv-228-FtM-99SPC MATTHEW BRIAN BUSH and BRANDON ERIC GUYER, Defendants. ___________________________________/ ORDER This matter comes before the Court on Defendant, Matthew Bush's Objection to Subpoena Duces Tecum and Motion for Protective Order (Doc. #11) filed on May 31, 2012. This Court previously issued an Order granting in part and denying in part Bush’s Motion for Protective Order (Doc. #18). In that Order, the Court noted that it would conduct an in camera review of the content of the text messages sent and received from Defendant Matthew Brian Bush’s cellular telephone number, (619) 997-9699, on March 22, 2012 – the date of the accident at issue in this case. The Court has received the information from Defense Counsel for in camera review and notes that as indicated in the cover letter to the Court – on which Plaintiff’s Counsel was copied – Verizon Wireless destroys the contents of all text messages not later than the fifth day following its being sent and/or received. Therefore, Defendant’s Motion for Protective Order regarding the content of Bush’s text messages sent and received from his cellular telephone on March 22, 2012 is denied as moot as it does not appear that Verizon Wireless is in possession of this information any longer. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: Defendant’s request for a protective order regarding the content of Bush’s text messages sent and received from his cellular telephone on March 22, 2012 is denied as moot. DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida this 4th day of September, 2012. Copies: All Parties of Record 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?