Brantley v. Myrick

Filing 25

ORDER denying 24 the Plaintiff, Brian Brantley's Motion for Entry of a Clerk's Default. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 3/22/2013. (LMF)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION BRIAN TIMOTHY BRANTLEY, Plaintiff, v. Case No: 2:12-cv-361-Ftm-99SPC DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. ___________________________________/ ORDER This matter comes before the Court on the Plaintiff, Brian Brantley's Motion for Entry of a Clerk's Default (Doc. #24) filed on March 20, 2013. Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a), default is justified “[w]hen a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise appear by affidavit or otherwise, the clerk shall enter the party’s default.” As grounds for entry for a Clerk’s Default, the Plaintiff states that the Defendant DEA was served on September 18, 2012, and was therefore required to answer by November 17, 2012. When the Defendant did not answer by November 17, 2013, the Plaintiff filed a Motion for Clerk’s Default. (Doc. # 17). On December 17, 2012, the Court denied the Plaintiff’s initial Motion for a Clerk’s Default because the Plaintiff’s original service upon the Defendant was ineffectual. The Court instructed the Plaintiff that in order to serve the United States or an agency of the United States like the DEA, the Plaintiff had to serve the U.S. Attorney in the district where the law suit was filed and the Attorney General of the United States. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i)(1)(2). The Plaintiff was then directed to serve the U.S. Attorney for the Middle District of Florida and the United States Attorney General as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i)(1)(2). The Clerk re-issued the Plaintiff’s summons and directed the U.S. Marshal’s Service to effect service in accord with the Federal Rules. On January 8, 2013, the U.S. Marshal’s Service served the U.S. Attorney for the Middle District of Florida. On January 15, 2013, the U.S Marshal’s Service subsequently served the United States Attorney General. As noted by the Plaintiff in his Motion, an agency of the United States, like the DEA, has sixty (60) days to file an answer or otherwise respond to a complaint. In this case, the Defendant DEA filed its Answer and Affirmative Defenses on March 1, 2013, well within the deadline for the DEA to answer under the Federal Rules. Thus, the Motion for Clerk’s Default is due to be denied. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: The Plaintiff, Brian Brantley's Motion for Entry of a Clerk's Default (Doc. #24) is DENIED. DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida this 22nd day of March, 2013. Copies: All Parties of Record 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?