Holsapple v. Volumetric Mixers By Strong, Inc.
Filing
23
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 19 Defendant, Volumetric Mixers By Strong, Inc.'s, Motion to Compel Discovery. Defendant, Volumetric Mixers By Strong, Inc.'s, Motion to Compel Production of Discovery Documents is DENIED as mo ot. Defendant, Volumetric Mixers By Strong, Inc.'s, Motion to Compel Answers to the Propounded Interrogatories is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall have up to and including February 20, 2013 to respond to Volumetric's Interrogatories. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 1/31/2013. (LMF)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
FORT MYERS DIVISION
JENNIFER HOLSAPPLE, as Personal
Representative of the Estate of Robert Jans,
deceased
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No: 2:12-cv-473-Ftm-99SPC
VOLUMETRIC MIXERS BY STRONG,
INC.,
Defendant.
___________________________________/
ORDER
This matter comes before the Court on Defendant, Volumetric Mixers By Strong, Inc.'s
(“Volumetric”), Motion to Compel Discovery (Doc. #19) filed on January 14, 2013. The Plaintiff
on January 28, 2013, filed her Response to Defendant’s Motion to Compel Discovery (Doc. #
20). The matter is fully briefed and is now ripe for review.
If the serving party does not receive a response to its interrogatories and request for
production, then it may request an order compelling disclosure. Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a). Whether or
not to grant the motion to compel is at the discretion of the trial court. Commercial Union
Insurance Co. v. Westrope, 730 F.2d 729, 731 (11th Cir. 1984).
On November 16, 2012, Volumetric served Plaintiff with its first set of interrogatories
and requests for production. Pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Plaintiff had to
respond to Volumetric’s requests by December 19, 2012. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 33(b) (providing a
party has thirty days to respond to a request for production); Fed. R. Civ. P. 34(b) (stating a party
served with interrogatories has thirty days after service to respond to the interrogatories).
Plaintiff, however, failed to respond to Volumetric’s discovery requests by December 19, 2012.
After several failed attempts to contact Plaintiff, Volumetric filed the instant motion that
requested this Court compel Plaintiff to produce “full and complete answers and responses” to its
discovery requests.
Since Volumetric filed this motion, Plaintiff, on January 24, 2013, produced responses to
Volumetric’s Requests for Production. As such, Volumetric’s request that this Court compel
Plaintiff to respond to its Requests for Production is moot.
However, Volumetric has not received an answer or response to its Interrogatories. Most
of the information requested by Volumetric must come from Jennifer Holsapple (the personal
representative of the Estate of Robert Jans). Plaintiff’s counsel asserts that despite his best efforts
he has been unable to contact Holsapple. To date, Plaintiff has not responded to Volumetric’s
Interrogatories.
Plaintiff’s counsel requests the Court grant him an additional twenty (20) days to respond
to Volumetric’s Interrogatories. While the Plaintiff’s Counsel requests twenty (20) days to file
full and complete answers to the interrogatories because he cannot communicate with his client,
it is incumbent upon the Plaintiff to comply with the Federal Rules and to cooperate in the
discovery process. The Plaintiff has not complied with the Federal Rules and the Motion to
Compel answers to the interrogatories is due to be granted. The Plaintiff’s counsel will use his
best efforts to contact his client so that she can respond to Volumetric’s discovery requests. The
Court will grant the Plaintiff twenty (20) days to file her answers.
Accordingly, it is now
ORDERED:
Defendant, Volumetric Mixers By Strong, Inc.'s, Motion to Compel Discovery (Doc.
#19) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
2
1. Defendant, Volumetric Mixers By Strong, Inc.'s, Motion to Compel Production of
Discovery Documents is DENIED as moot.
2. Defendant, Volumetric Mixers By Strong, Inc.'s, Motion to Compel Answers to the
Propounded Interrogatories is GRANTED.
3. Plaintiff shall have up to and including February 20, 2013 to respond to
Volumetric’s Interrogatories.
DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida this 31st day of January, 2013.
Copies: All Parties of Record
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?