Taylor Bean & Whitaker Mortgage Corp. v. Lennar Corporation et al

Filing 99

ORDER re #97 Case Management Report. The Parties' Case Management Report #97 is STRICKEN. The Clerk of Court is directed to note on the docket that this entry is stricken. The Parties are directed to file a revised case management report on or before March 25, 2013. The Parties may conduct any case management conferences telephonically. A notice of appearance must be filed on behalf of the pro se Defendants by March 18, 2013. If no notice of appearance is filed, the Court will assume they are proceeding pro se. The corporate Defendants MUST obtain counsel. Failure to do so could result in default judgment being entered against it. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 2/19/2013. (LMF)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION TAYLOR BEAN & WHITAKER MORTGAGE CORP. and FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, Plaintiffs, v. Case No: 2:12-cv-595-Ftm-99SPC LENNAR CORPORATION, U.S. HOME CORPORATION, NORTH AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY, AYLA D. BURNETT, CHARLES M. BURNETT, PEGGY FERGUSON, JENNIFER WHITE, JULIE WHITE, UTAH EXCHANGE GROUP, ASPEN HOME LOANS, LLC, KELLY HATCH, PAUL ANDREW GULBRONSON, MICHAEL RILEY MOORE, SR. , RIVERWALK PROPERTY VENTURES, LLC, MATTHEW DEVEREAUX, ANDREW JAMES SORENSEN, ANTHONY GIZZI REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL, INC. and DAVID SAWYER, Defendants. ___________________________________/ ORDER This matter comes before the Court on the Parties’ Case Management Report (Doc. #97) filed on February 13, 2013. Upon review of the filing, the Court notes that it requests an additional 30 days for certain pro se Defendants to obtain counsel, after which they reserve the right to file a motion to amend the case management report after they obtain counsel. So that all Parties may participate in the case management conference and submission of the case management report, the Court will strike the instant Case Management Report and allow 30 days for pro se Defendants to obtain counsel. After the 30 days, if there has been no entry of a notice of appearance, the Court will assume the individual Defendants are proceeding pro se and they must participate in the case management conference. The corporate Defendants MUST obtain counsel. Under Local Rule 2.03(e), a corporation may appear and be heard only through counsel admitted to the Court pursuant to Local Rule 2.01 or 2.02. The rule is well established that a corporation is an artificial entity that can only be represented through its agents. Palazzo v. Gulf Oil Corp., 764 F.2d 1382, 1385 (11th Cir. 1985). It cannot appear in judicial proceedings pro se but must instead be represented by licensed counsel. Id. The general rule that corporations must be represented by an attorney in judicial actions applies even where the person seeking to represent the corporation is its president and/or major stock holder. Id. The Court further notes that the dates which the Parties have proposed are far outside the recommendations provided by the Court on the case management form. The Parties shall meet and confer and come to some agreement on dates that are more in line with the recommendations provided by the Court. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: (1) The Parties’ Case Management Report (Doc. #97) is STRICKEN. The Clerk of Court is directed to note on the docket that this entry is stricken. The Parties are directed to file a revised case management report on or before March 25, 2013. The Parties may conduct any case management conferences telephonically. (2) A notice of appearance must be filed on behalf of the pro se Defendants by March 18, 2013. If no notice of appearance is filed, the Court will assume they are 2 proceeding pro se. The corporate Defendants MUST obtain counsel. Failure to do so could result in default judgment being entered against it. DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida this 19th day of February, 2013. Copies: All Parties of Record 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?