BMO Harris Bank N.A. v. Anderson et al
Filing
59
ORDER granting 58 Plaintiff's Motion for Default by the Clerk Against Defendant Margaret Veneigh. The Clerk is directed to enter Clerk's Default against Defendant Margaret Veneigh. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carol Mirando on 4/23/2014. (BLW)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
FORT MYERS DIVISION
BMO HARRIS BANK N.A., successorby-merger to M&I Marshall & Ilsley
Bank,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No: 2:12-cv-631-FtM-29CM
ROBERT M. ANDERSON,
ROBERT M. ANDERSON,
DANIEL VENEIGH and
MARGARET VENEIGH,
Defendants.
ORDER
Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Default by the Clerk Against
Defendant Margaret Veneigh (Doc. 58) filed on April 22, 2014. Plaintiff BMO Harris
Bank, N.A. (“BMO”) moves pursuant Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a), for entry
of a Clerk’s Default against Defendant Margaret Veneigh (“M. Veneigh”) for failure
to respond to the Complaint. For the reasons that follow, the Motion is due to be
granted.
Pursuant to Rule 55(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, “[w]hen a party
against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or
otherwise defend, and that failure is shown by affidavit or otherwise, the clerk must
enter the party’s default.” Prior to directing the Clerk to enter a default, the Court
must first determine whether the Plaintiff properly effected service of process.
United States v. Donald, No. 3:09-cv-147-J-32HTS, 2009 WL 1810357, *1 (M.D. Fla.
June 24, 2009).
Service on an individual can be made by any manner accepted in the state or
by “delivering a copy of the summons and of the complaint to the individual
personally.”
Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e)(1), (e)(2)(A).
Section 48.031, Florida Statutes,
provides that “[s]ervice of original process is made by delivering a copy of it to the
person to be served with a copy of the complaint, petition, or other initial pleading or
paper. . . .” Fla. Stat. § 48.031(1)(a).
The Return of Service shows that M. Veneigh was personally served with the
Summons and Second Amended Verified Complaint on November 1, 2013, at 411 SW
47th Terrace, Cape Coral, Florida, 33914. Doc. 31. The Second Amended Verified
Complaint was subsequently dismissed on March 11, 2014, for lack of subject-matter
jurisdiction without prejudice to filing a third amended complaint. Doc. 45. 1
Third Amended Complaint was filed on March 12, 2014.
Doc. 46.
A
The Third
Amended Complaint was served by U.S. Mail on M. Veneigh on March 12, 2014,
according to the pleading’s Certificate of Service. Id. at 7.
The Court finds that service of process was properly effected as to Defendant
M. Veneigh, because the Summons and Second Amended Verified Complaint was
personally served on her. Further, Federal Rule 5(a)(2) provides that no service is
A clerk’s default was previously entered against M. Veneigh on February 11, 2014,
for failure to respond to the Second Amended Verified Complaint (Doc. 35), but that
complaint has since been dismissed (Doc. 45) and a Third Amended Complaint has been filed.
Docs. 46, 57.
1
-2-
required on a party who is in default for failing to appear unless the pleading asserts
a new claim for relief against a party. The Third Amended Complaint was identical
to the Second Amended Complaint, except for the allegations regarding citizenship of
the parties. Compare Doc. 28 with Doc. 46. Because the Third Amended Complaint
did not contain any new claims for relief, BMO was permitted to serve the Third
Amended Complaint via mail. Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(a)(2), (b)(2)(C).
Pursuant to Rule 12(a)(1)(A), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a defendant
must serve an answer within 21 days after being served with the summons and
complaint. M. Veneigh has failed to do so within the time period; therefore, entry of
Clerk’s Default is appropriate.
ACCORDINGLY, it is hereby
ORDERED:
Plaintiff’s Motion for Default by the Clerk Against Defendant Margaret
Veneigh (Doc. 58) is GRANTED; and the Clerk is directed to enter Clerk’s Default
against Defendant Margaret Veneigh.
DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on this 23rd day of April, 2014.
Copies:
Counsel of record
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?