Hill v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 27

ORDER that the 26 Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED and is made a part of this Order for all purposes. Plaintiff's 25 Petition for Attorney's Fees is GRANTED. Plaintiff is awarded attorney fees in the amount of $5,180.45 and costs in the amount of $385.00 which may be paid directly to counsel if the United States Department of Treasury determines that no federal debt is owed. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 2/25/2014. (DH)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION NANCY JAYNE HILL, Plaintiff, v. Case No: 2:13-cv-120-FtM-38DNF COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. / ORDER1 This matter comes before the Court on Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Douglas N. Frazier (Doc. #26) filed on February 10, 2014. Judge Frazier recommends Plaintiff’s Petition for Attorney Fees (Doc. #25) be granted, and attorney fees in the amount of $5,180.45 and costs in the amount of $385.00 be awarded to Plaintiff, which may be paid directly to counsel if the United States Department of Treasury determines that no federal debt is owed. No objections have been filed. After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject, or modify the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982); cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1112 (1983). In the absence of specific objections, there is no requirement that a district judge review factual findings de novo, Garvey v. 1 Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users’ convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other Web sites, this court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993), and the court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings and recommendations. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The district judge reviews legal conclusions de novo, even in the absence of an objection. See Cooper-Houston v Southern Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994); Castro Bobadilla v. Reno, 826 F. Supp. 1428, 1431-32 (S.D. Fla. 1993), aff’d, 28 F.3d 116 (11th Cir.1994) (Table). The Court has made an independent review of the record and Judge Frazier’s Report and Recommendation. The Court agrees with Judge Frazier’s findings. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: 1. Report and Recommendation (Doc. #26) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED and is made a part of this Order for all purposes. 2. Plaintiff’s Petition for Attorney’s Fees (Doc. #25) is GRANTED. Plaintiff is awarded attorney fees in the amount of $5,180.45 and costs in the amount of $385.00 which may be paid directly to counsel if the United States Department of Treasury determines that no federal debt is owed. DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida this 25th day of February, 2014. Copies: All Parties of Record 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?