PNC Bank, N.A. v. DBAK Holdings, LLC et al

Filing 19

ORDER granting 18 The Plaintiff, PNC Bank, N.A.'s Motion for Clerk's Default. The Clerk of the Court is hereby directed to enter a Clerk's Default against the Defendant DBAK Holdings, LLC. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 5/15/2013. (LMF)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION PNC BANK, N.A., as successor in interest to RBC Bank (USA), as successor in interest to Community Bank of Naples, N.A. Plaintiff, v. Case No: 2:13-cv-247-Ftm-99SPC DBAK HOLDINGS, LLC, DONNA H. KELLER, BRANT KELLER, PARKER COMMONS OFFICE PARK CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION INC. and UNKNOWN OCCUPANTS, Defendants. ___________________________________/ ORDER This matter comes before the Court on the Plaintiff, PNC Bank, N.A.’s Motion for Clerk's Default (Doc. #18) filed on May 14, 2013. Plaintiff, PNC Bank, N.A. pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 55 and Local Rule 1.07(b), moves for Clerk’s Default against Defendant, DBAK Holdings, LLC (“DBAK”). Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a), default is justified “[w]hen a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise appear by affidavit or otherwise, the clerk shall enter the party’s default.” On April 3, 2013, Donna H. Keller, Registered Agent of DBAK was served at 794 105th Street, Naples, FL 34108 with a copy of the Bank’s Summons and Verified Complaint. To date, DBAK has failed to file an answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint and the time to do so has expired. Thus, good cause exists to grant the Motion for a Clerk’s Default. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: The Plaintiff, PNC Bank, N.A.’s Motion for Clerk's Default (Doc. #18) is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is hereby directed to enter a Clerk’s Default against the Defendant DBAK Holdings, LLC. DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida this 15th day of May, 2013. Copies: All Parties of Record 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?