American Registry, LLC v. Hanaw et al

Filing 72

OPINION AN ORDER granting 66 Motion for voluntary dismissal with prejudice to the extent that the case is dismissed with prejudice without further conditions. The Clerk shall enter judgment dismissing the case with prejudice, terminate all pending motions, and close the file. Defendants may file any motions for attorney's fees and/or costs as provided by law. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 12/5/2014. (RKR)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION AMERICAN Delaware company, REGISTRY, LLC, a limited liability Plaintiff, v. Case No: 2:13-cv-352-FtM-29CM YONAH HANAW, MICHAEL LEVY, SHOWMARK HOLDINGS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, and SHOWMARK MEDIA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER This matter comes before the Court on plaintiff's Verified Motion for Voluntary Dismissal With Prejudice (Doc. #66) filed on October 23, 2014. Defendants filed a Response in Opposition (Doc. #68) to the request, seeking to reach the merits of the claims or to receive their incurred attorney’s fees and costs. On November 7, 2014, the Court took the Verified Motion under advisement and provided the parties an opportunity to resolve the matter or for plaintiff to file a Reply. (Doc. #69.) On November 17, 2014, plaintiff filed a Reply (Doc. #71) stating that the parties were unable to reach an agreement, and seeking dismissal with prejudice but without costs or attorney’s fees. Plaintiff is proceeding on a portion of a Third Amended Complaint (Doc. #36), to which an Answer (Doc. #62) has been filed. (Doc. #61.) uncomfortable To with oversimplify, the plaintiff credibility of its has now primary become source of information (referred to by the initials PR), who plaintiff asserts is now offering his testimony to the highest bidder. Plaintiff seeks to dismiss all its claim against defendants with prejudice, but seeks a condition that it not be required to pay attorney fees or costs. Defendants oppose the dismissal, even with prejudice, asserting a “vested interest” in continuing the litigation, vindicating themselves, and potentially obtaining attorney fees and costs. This action is governed by Rule 41(a)(2), which provides that “an action may be dismissed at the plaintiff's request only by court order, on terms that the court considers proper.” Civ. P. 41(a)(2). judgment concedes. on the Fed. R. A dismissal with prejudice will operate as a merits in favor of defendants, as plaintiff The Court rejects defendants’ position that they have a vested interest in continuing the litigation, and finds that no prejudice will result to defendants upon such a dismissal. Dismissal with prejudice will place defendants in no worse of a position than if they had prevailed on a summary judgment motion or at trial. - 2 - The Court is unwilling, however, to condition the dismissal with prejudice upon either the granting or denying of attorney fees and costs. Upon dismissal, defendants may seek attorney fees and/or costs in the same manner as any defendant who has prevailed on the merits. Whether defendants are entitled to such fees, and the amounts, are left for another day. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff's Verified Motion for Voluntary Dismissal With Prejudice (Doc. #66) is GRANTED to the extent that the case is dismissed with prejudice, and is DENIED to the extent that plaintiff or defendants seek to further condition the dismissal. The Clerk shall enter judgment dismissing the case with prejudice against all defendants. 2. The Clerk shall further terminate all pending motions and deadlines as moot and close the file. 3. Defendants may file any motions for attorney fees and/or costs as provided by law. DONE and ORDERED at Fort Myers, Florida, this December, 2014. Copies: Counsel of Record - 3 - 5th day of

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?