Jipson v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
33
ORDER granting 32 the Commissioner's Unopposed Motion for Entry of Judgment with Remand. The Decision of the Commissioner is hereby reversed and the case is remanded under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to the Commissioner of Social Security: On remand, the Commissioner will remand the case to the Administrative Law Judge to: (a) reassess Plaintiff's residual functional capacity and provide rationale for the assessed limitations; (b) reevaluate the medical source opinions, including the opinions of the state agency medical consultants; (c) reassess Plaintiff's credibility; (d) clarify the demands of Plaintiff's past relevant work and/or of the assessed limitations on Plaintiff's occupational base, and i f warranted, obtain vocational expert evidence; (e) if Plaintiff is found disabled, conduct the further proceedings required to determine whether drug addiction and alcoholism are contributing factors material to the determination of disability; and (f) any other proceedings the Commissioner deems appropriate. The Clerk is directed to enter Judgment accordingly and CLOSE the file. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 4/15/2014. (LMF)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
FORT MYERS DIVISION
DANIEL JIPSON,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No: 2:13-cv-450-FtM-38DNF
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,
Defendant.
/
ORDER1
This matter comes before the Court on The Commissioner's Unopposed Motion
for Entry of Judgment with Remand (Doc. #32) filed on April 14, 2014. The Commissioner
seeks a remand for further administrative proceedings. Plaintiff does not oppose the
motion.
Accordingly, it is now
ORDERED:
1. The Commissioner's Unopposed Motion for Entry of Judgment with Remand
(Doc. #32) is GRANTED. The Decision of the Commissioner is hereby
reversed and the case is remanded under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)
to the Commissioner of Social Security:
1
Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. These
hyperlinks are provided only for users’ convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in
CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other Web sites, this court does not endorse,
recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their Web
sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The court
accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink
ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.
On remand, the Commissioner will remand the case to the Administrative
Law Judge to: (a) reassess Plaintiff’s residual functional capacity and
provide rationale for the assessed limitations; (b) reevaluate the medical
source opinions, including the opinions of the state agency medical
consultants; (c) reassess Plaintiff’s credibility; (d) clarify the demands of
Plaintiff’s past relevant work and/or of the assessed limitations on Plaintiff’s
occupational base, and if warranted, obtain vocational expert evidence; (e)
if Plaintiff is found disabled, conduct the further proceedings required to
determine whether drug addiction and alcoholism are contributing factors
material to the determination of disability; and (f) any other proceedings the
Commissioner deems appropriate.
2. The Clerk is directed to enter Judgment accordingly and CLOSE the file.
DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida this 15th day of April, 2014.
Copies: All Parties of Record
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?