Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut et al v. Attorney's Title Insurance Fund, Inc. et al

Filing 187

ORDER re 181 Notice (Other) filed by Attorney's Title Insurance Fund, Inc., RSUI Indemnity Company, CAS Group, Inc., Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut, Florida Title Co., St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company, Sect ion 10 Joint Venture, LLP, Sky Property Venture, LLC. The Parties' Joint Notice of Filing Proposed Case Management Dates 181 is GRANTED. SEE ORDER FOR FIFTH AMENDED CASE MANAGEMENT AND SCHEDULING ORDER DEADLINES. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 3/25/2015. (LMF)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CONNECTICUT and ST. PAUL FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiffs, v. Case No: 2:13-cv-670-FtM-38DNF ATTORNEY’S TITLE INSURANCE FUND, INC., FLORIDA TITLE CO., SECTION 10 JOINT VENTURE, LLP, SKY PROPERTY VENTURE, LLC, CAS GROUP, INC., STEPHAN, COLE & ASSOCIATES, LLC and INTEGRA REALTY RESOURCES SOUTHWEST FLORIDA, INC., Defendants. / ORDER1 This matter comes before the Court on the Parties' Joint Notice of Filing Proposed Case Management Dates (Doc. #181) filed on March 20, 2015. At a recent Pretrial Conference, the Parties asked the Court to amend the case management dates yet again. (Doc. #179). After finding that the Parties presented good cause for doing so, the Court asked the Parties to file their new proposed case management dates for review. The Parties have now done so. (Doc. #181). Because the new proposed case management dates appear to be a reasonable extension of the current dates, the Court adopts the 1 Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users’ convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other Web sites, this Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court. Parties’ new proposed dates. However, the Court warns the Parties that any additional requests for extensions of these deadlines will be met with very strict scrutiny. Again, the Court is available telephonically (239-461-2060) for swift resolution of any issues that may arise to ensure the Parties meet the deadlines set out below. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: 1. The Parties' Joint Notice of Filing Proposed Case Management Dates (Doc. #181) is GRANTED. The Court enters this Fifth Amended Case Management and Scheduling Order: ATIF shall produce all remaining ATIF and Carlton Fields documents requested to date as to which no objection is asserted: Disclosure of Expert Reports Plaintiff: Defendants: Discovery Deadline: Dispositive Motions, Daubert Motions: Mediation Deadline: Meeting in Person to Prepare Joint Final Pretrial Statement: Joint Final Pretrial Statement (Including a Single Set of Jointly Proposed Jury Instructions and Verdict Form, Voir Dire Questions, Witness Lists, and Exhibit Lists on Approved Form): All Other Motions, Including Motions In Limine, Trial Briefs: Final Pretrial Conference Date: Time: Judge: Trial Term Begins: March 31, 2015 July 17, 2015 August 17, 2015 October 2, 2015 November 2, 2015 November 27, 2015 January 29, 2016 February 29, 2016 February 29, 2016 March 18, 2016 9:30 A.M. The Honorable Sheri Polster Chappell April 5, 2016 DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida, this 25th day of March, 2015. Copies: All Parties of Record 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?