Ave Maria School of Law v. Sebelius et al

Filing 55

ORDER: Plaintiff's Partially Unopposed Scheduling Motion (Dkt. 54) is granted in part. The Court's prior scheduling Order set forth at Dkt. 52 is hereby VACATED. The parties may brief a preliminary injunction motion. The School's motion for preliminary injunction shall be filed on or before September 12, 2014. The Government's response to the motion for preliminary injunction shall be filed on or before September 22, 2014. The parties are allotted 35 pages for argument. The Court will issue a ruling on the motion for preliminary injunction prior to the November 1, 2014 deadline. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 7/30/2014. (LN)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION AVE MARIA SCHOOL OF LAW, Plaintiff, v. Case No: 2:13-cv-795-JSM-CM KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, et al., Defendants. ORDER THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Partially Unopposed Scheduling Motion (Dkt. 54). Upon review of the motion, and being otherwise advised in the premises, the motion is granted in part. Specifically, the Court adopts the briefing schedule set forth in option two of the motion. It is therefore ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that: 1. Plaintiff’s Partially Unopposed Scheduling Motion (Dkt. 54) is granted in part. 2. The Court’s prior scheduling Order set forth at Dkt. 52 is hereby VACATED. 3. The parties may brief a preliminary injunction motion. 4. The School’s motion for preliminary injunction shall be filed on or before September 12, 2014. 5. The Government’s response to the motion for preliminary injunction shall be filed on or before September 22, 2014. 6. The parties are allotted 35 pages for argument. 7. The Court will issue a ruling on the motion for preliminary injunction prior to the November 1, 2014 deadline. DONE and ORDERED in Tampa, Florida on July 30, 2014. Copies furnished to: Counsel/Parties of Record S:\FT MYERS cases\13-cv-795.mt-schedulingDkt.54.wpd

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?