Capitol Preferred Insurance Company v. Whirlpool Corporation

Filing 16

ORDER directing defendant to show cause within 7 days of this Order why the case should not be remanded for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 2/18/2014. (RKR)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION CAPITOL PREFERRED INSURANCE COMPANY, a/s/o Ray Zimmerly Plaintiff, v. Case No: 2:13-cv-868-FtM-29CM WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION, a foreign profit corporation, Defendant. ORDER This matter comes before the Court on review of the Notice of Removal (Doc. #1) filed on December 13, 2013.1 jurisdiction is premised on the jurisdiction between the parties. complete diversity of presence of (Id., ¶¶ 2, 4.) citizenship, and that Subject-matter diversity of This requires the matter in controversy exceed the sum or value of $75,000, exclusive of interest and costs. 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a); Morrison v. Allstate Indem. Co., 228 F.3d 1255, 1261 (11th Cir. 2000). 1 If the Court determines “at any time” that it lacks subjectmatter jurisdiction, the Court must dismiss the case. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). As the party seeking federal jurisdiction, the burden is upon defendant to establish diversity jurisdiction as of the date of removal. Sammie Bonner Constr. Co. v. W. Star Trucks Sales, Inc., 330 F.3d 1308, 1310 (11th Cir. 2003); Williams v. Best Buy Co., 269 F.3d 1316, 1319 (11th Cir. 2001). Plaintiff alleges property damages exceeding $75,000 on the face of the Complaint (Doc. #2). Therefore, the Court is satisfied as to the amount in controversy. Defendant alleges that plaintiff Capitol Preferred Insurance Company is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Florida. (Doc. #1, ¶ 3.) The attached Florida Department of State, Division of Corporations, sheet provides that plaintiff is a Florida Profit Corporation and that a “principal address” is in Florida. principal address is the Defendant does not allege that the principal place of business. A corporation is a citizen of both the state of its incorporation and the state where it has its principal place of business. 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1). The principal place of business is determined by the “nerve center” test. (2010). Hertz Corp. v. Friend, 559 U.S. 77 Defendant does not adequately allege the citizenship of plaintiff, however an opportunity to state the presence of federal jurisdiction will be provided. 28 U.S.C. § 1653. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: 2 Defendant shall show cause within SEVEN (7) DAYS of this Order why the case should not be remanded for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. DONE AND ORDERED at Fort Myers, Florida, this February, 2014. Copies: Counsel of record 3 18th day of

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?