Capitol Preferred Insurance Company v. Whirlpool Corporation
Filing
16
ORDER directing defendant to show cause within 7 days of this Order why the case should not be remanded for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 2/18/2014. (RKR)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
FORT MYERS DIVISION
CAPITOL PREFERRED INSURANCE
COMPANY, a/s/o Ray Zimmerly
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No: 2:13-cv-868-FtM-29CM
WHIRLPOOL
CORPORATION,
a
foreign profit corporation,
Defendant.
ORDER
This matter comes before the Court on review of the Notice
of Removal (Doc. #1) filed on December 13, 2013.1
jurisdiction
is
premised
on
the
jurisdiction between the parties.
complete
diversity
of
presence
of
(Id., ¶¶ 2, 4.)
citizenship,
and
that
Subject-matter
diversity
of
This requires
the
matter
in
controversy exceed the sum or value of $75,000, exclusive of
interest and costs.
28 U.S.C. § 1332(a); Morrison v. Allstate
Indem. Co., 228 F.3d 1255, 1261 (11th Cir. 2000).
1
If the Court determines “at any time” that it lacks subjectmatter jurisdiction, the Court must dismiss the case.
Fed. R.
Civ. P. 12(h)(3).
As the party seeking federal jurisdiction, the burden is upon
defendant to establish diversity jurisdiction as of the date of
removal.
Sammie Bonner Constr. Co. v. W. Star Trucks Sales, Inc.,
330 F.3d 1308, 1310 (11th Cir. 2003); Williams v. Best Buy Co.,
269 F.3d 1316, 1319 (11th Cir. 2001).
Plaintiff alleges property
damages exceeding $75,000 on the face of the Complaint (Doc. #2).
Therefore, the Court is satisfied as to the amount in controversy.
Defendant alleges that plaintiff Capitol Preferred Insurance
Company is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of
the State of Florida.
(Doc. #1, ¶ 3.)
The attached Florida
Department of State, Division of Corporations, sheet provides that
plaintiff is a Florida Profit Corporation and that a “principal
address” is in Florida.
principal
address
is
the
Defendant does not allege that the
principal
place
of
business.
A
corporation is a citizen of both the state of its incorporation
and the state where it has its principal place of business.
28
U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1). The principal place of business is determined
by the “nerve center” test.
(2010).
Hertz Corp. v. Friend, 559 U.S. 77
Defendant does not adequately allege the citizenship of
plaintiff, however an opportunity to state the presence of federal
jurisdiction will be provided.
28 U.S.C. § 1653.
Accordingly, it is now
ORDERED:
2
Defendant shall show cause within SEVEN (7) DAYS of this Order
why the case should not be remanded for lack of subject-matter
jurisdiction.
DONE AND ORDERED at Fort Myers, Florida, this
February, 2014.
Copies:
Counsel of record
3
18th
day of
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?