Sherman et al v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation

Filing 34

ORDER re 33 Notice (Other) filed by Kathy Sherman, Roger Sherman. Because this case involves questions of law or fact common to those in Campese v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Case No.: 2:14-cv-00205-JES-DNF, currently before the Hon orable John E. Steele, this cause is hereby transferred to Judge Steele, with his consent, for all further proceedings pursuant to Local Rule 1.04(b), Middle District of Florida. Plaintiffs' Motion to Consolidate Cases or, in the alternative, to Transfer before Same Judge and Supporting Memorandum of Law [33-1] is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 7/9/2014. (LMF)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
FORT MYERS DIVISION
ROGER SHERMAN and KATHY
SHERMAN,
Plaintiffs,
v.

Case No: 2:14-cv-173-FtM-38DNF

NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS
CORPORATION,
Defendant.
/
ORDER1
Because this case involves questions of law or fact common to those in Campese
v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Case No.: 2:14-cv-00205-JES-DNF, currently
before the Honorable John E. Steele, this cause is hereby transferred to Judge Steele,
with his consent, for all further proceedings pursuant to Local Rule 1.04(b), Middle District
of Florida. Plaintiffs’ Motion to Consolidate Cases or, in the alternative, to Transfer before
Same Judge and Supporting Memorandum of Law (Doc. 33-1) is DENIED as moot.
DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida this 9th day of July, 2014.

Copies: All Parties of Record
1

Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. These
hyperlinks are provided only for users’ convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in
CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other Web sites, this court does not endorse,
recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their Web
sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The court
accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink
ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.