Gerst et al v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A.
Filing
22
ORDER dismissing case re 20 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File. With no remaining claims, this case is DISMISSED without prejudice.The Clerk is directed to CLOSE the file and enter judgment accordingly. The Clerk is further directed to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 3/3/2015. (LMF)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
FORT MYERS DIVISION
CHARMAYNE SMITH,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No: 2:14-cv-201-FtM-38CM
HSBC BANK USA, N.A.,
Defendant.
/
ORDER1
This matter comes before the Court on review of the docket. On December 22,
2014, the Court gave Plaintiff Charmayne Smith an extension of time to properly serve
Defendant HSBC Bank USA, N.A. (See Doc. #20). The Court warned that failure to
properly serve Defendant and timely file a return of service notification on the docket
would result in this case being dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. To
date, Smith has not complied with the Court’s order and has not served HSBC Bank.2 As
a result, the Court will dismiss this matter without prejudice for failure to prosecute. See
Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m); Link v. Washbash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 630-31 (1962) (“The
authority of a court to dismiss sua sponte for lack of prosecution has generally been
considered an ‘inherent power,’ governed not by rule or statute but by the control
1
Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. These
hyperlinks are provided only for users’ convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in
CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other Web sites, this court does not endorse,
recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their Web
sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The court
accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink
ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.
2 Smith, however, filed a “Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for an Order Compelling Mediation.”
(See Doc. #21).
necessarily vested in courts to manage their own affairs so as to achieve the orderly and
expeditious disposition of cases.”); see also Krinsk v. SunTrust Bank, No. 8:09-cv-00909T-27MA, 2014 WL 202032, at *5 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 17, 2014) (dismissing a claim with
prejudice for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with a court order).
Accordingly, it is now
ORDERED:
1. With no remaining claims, this case is DISMISSED without prejudice.
2. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE the file and enter judgment accordingly. The
Clerk is further directed to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff.
DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida this 3rd day of March, 2015.
Copies: All Parties of Record
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?