Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas v. Gillis
Filing
40
ORDER. This case is STAYED as to Homecomings Financial, LLC and Residential Funding Company, LLC ONLY. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to place a stay flag on this case. Homecomings Financial, LLC and Residential Funding Company, LLC shall advise the Court, in writing, as to the status of any relief it seeks from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, as set forth in their Amended Notice of Bankruptcy Status (Doc. #30), on or before November 13, 2014, and every SIXTY (60) DAYS thereafter. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 10/14/2014. (LMF)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
FORT MYERS DIVISION
RONALD P. GILLIS,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No: 2:14-cv-418-FtM-38DNF
DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST CO.
AMERICAS, GMAC-RFC MASTER
SERVICING, HOMECOMINGS
FINANCIAL, ERIN MAE ROSE
QUINN, and ANDREW LEE
FIVECOAT,
Defendants.
/
ORDER1
This matter comes before the Court on the Amended Notice of Bankruptcy Status
(Doc. #30) filed by Homecomings Financial, LLC ("HFN") and Residential Funding
Company, LLC ("RFC") on October 9, 2014.2 Plaintiff filed a Motion and Objection to
"RFC" and "Homecomings Financial" Request to be Removed from Case (Doc. #39) on
October 9, 2014, which the Court construes as an opposition to the Amended Notice of
Bankruptcy Status. This matter is ripe for review.
On May 14, 2012, Residential Capital, LLC, and its direct and indirect subsidiaries,
1
Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. These
hyperlinks are provided only for users’ convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in
CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other Web sites, this Court does not
endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on
their Web sites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites.
The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that
a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court.
2
HFN and RFC inform the Court that Plaintiff improperly named them in the Complaint as "GMAC-RFC
Mastering Service." (Doc. #1 at 1). Since GMAC-RFC Master Servicing is not a registered entity, RFC
responds on behalf of whatever entity Plaintiff has attempted to name. (Doc. #1 at 1 n.1).
including HFN and RFC, filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New
York (the "Bankruptcy Court"). (Doc. #30 at ¶ 1). HFN's and RFC's Chapter 11 cases
were jointly administered under Case No. 12-12020. (Doc. #30 at ¶ 1).
On December 11, 2013, the Bankruptcy Court entered an Order Confirming
Second Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan Proposed by Residential Capital, LLC, et al. and
the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors (the "Confirmation Order"). (Doc. #30 at
¶ 2). The Confirmation Order approved the terms of the Chapter 11 plan, as amended
(the "Plan"). Additionally, the Plan's effective date occurred on December 17, 2013. (Doc.
#30 at ¶ 2).
Pertinent to this case, the injunctive provisions of the Plan and Confirmation Order
have remained in full force and effect following the effective date. (Doc. #30 at ¶ 3).
Specifically, Article IX.I of the Plan and Section G of Paragraph 40 of the Confirmation
Order "enjoin[] all parties from 'commencing or continuing in any manner or action or
other proceeding of any kind' relating to claims that are released under the Plan." (Doc.
#30 at ¶ 3). Additionally, Article VIII.B of the Plan states the claim of any creditor that
failed to file a proof of claim by the applicable deadline
SHALL BE DEEMED DISALLOWED, DISCHARGED,
RELEASED, AND EXPUNGED AS OF THE EFFECTIVE
DATE WITHOUT ANY FURTHER NOTICE TO OR ACTION,
ORDER, OR APPROVAL OF THE BANKRUPTCY COURT,
AND HOLDERS OF SUCH CLAIMS MAY NOT RECEIVE
ANY DISTRIBUTIONS ON ACCOUNT OF SUCH CLAIMS,
UNLESS SUCH LATE PROOF OF CLAIM IS DEEMED
TIMELY FILED BY A FINAL ORDER OF THE BANKRUPTCY
COURT.
(Doc. #30 at ¶ 4). Finally, the Bankruptcy Court has retained exclusive jurisdiction to hear
all matters pertaining to an injunction provided under the Plan and Confirmation Order.
(Doc. #30 at ¶ 5).
According to HFN and RFC, Plaintiff is barred from continuing to prosecute this
action against them because he did not file a timely proof of claim in the Chapter 11
bankruptcy cases. (Doc. #30 at ¶ 6). Plaintiff challenges HFN and RFC's position,
arguing that he filed a proof of claim on or about August 31, 2012, and informed the
Bankruptcy Court of "possible bankruptcy fraud perpetrated by GMAC and/or its
subsidiaries on August 27, 2012." (Doc. #39 at 2). Since Plaintiff contests a dismissal of
his claims against HFN and RFC, HFN and RFC will seek relief from the Bankruptcy Court
in the form of an order (1) enforcing the injunction provision of the Plan and Confirmation
Order, and (2) prohibiting Plaintiff from continuing prosecution of this action against them.
(Doc. #30 at ¶ 6). In the meantime, HFN and RFC request that the Court stay Plaintiff's
case as it relates to them. (Doc. #30 at ¶ 7).
In light of the Plan's and Confirmation Order's injunction provisions, this matter is
stayed against HFN and RFC only.
Accordingly, it is now
ORDERED:
(1) This case is STAYED as to Homecomings Financial, LLC and Residential
Funding Company, LLC ONLY.
(2) The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to place a stay flag on this case.
(3) Homecomings Financial, LLC and Residential Funding Company, LLC shall
advise the Court, in writing, as to the status of any relief it seeks from the United
States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, as set forth in
their Amended Notice of Bankruptcy Status (Doc. #30), on or before November
13, 2014, and every SIXTY (60) DAYS thereafter.
DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida this 14th day of October, 2014.
Copies: All Parties of Record
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?