Ward v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
30
ORDER granting 29 Plaintiff's Unopposed Application for Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carol Mirando on 10/28/2015. (ANW)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
FORT MYERS DIVISION
CORNELIUS WARD,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No: 2:14-cv-419-FtM-CM
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,
Defendant.
ORDER
Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Unopposed Application for Attorney Fees Under
the Equal Access to Justice Act (Doc. 29) filed on October 26, 2015. Plaintiff moves
pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), for an
award of attorney’s fees in the amount of $6,107.97.
Plaintiff attaches an
itemization of time confirming a total of 21.5 hours worked at a rate of $191.08 per
hour in 2014, and 10.55 hours worked at a rate of $189.55 per hour in 2015 on this
matter. Doc. 29 at 9. Plaintiff represents that the Commissioner has no objection
to the Motion or relief requested.
For the reasons stated herein, the Motion is
granted.
Under the EAJA, a claimant is eligible for an attorney fee award where: (1) the
claimant is a prevailing party in a non-tort suit involving the United States; (2) the
Government’s position was not substantially justified; (3) the claimant filed a timely
application for attorney’s fees; (4) the claimant had a net worth of less than $2 million
at the time the complaint was filed; and (5) there are no special circumstances which
would make the award of fees unjust. 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d).
In this case, on September 29, 2015 the Court entered an Opinion and Order
reversing and remanding this case to the Commissioner for further proceedings
pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Doc. 27. Judgment was entered on
September 30, 2015.
Doc. 28.
Plaintiff also asserts that the Commissioner’s
position in the underlying action was not substantially justified and that her net
worth at the time this proceeding was filed was less than two million dollars. Doc.
29 at 1-2. The Commissioner does not contest that Plaintiff meets the requirements
under the EAJA, and the Court finds that all conditions have been met.
EAJA fees are “based upon prevailing market rates for the kind and quality of
services furnished,” not to exceed $125.00 per hour unless the Court determines that
an increase in the cost of living or a special factor justifies a higher fee. 28 U.S.C. §
2412(d)(2)(A).
process.
Determination of the appropriate hourly rate is thus a two-step
The Court first determines the prevailing market rate; then, if the
prevailing rate exceeds $125.00, the Court determines whether to adjust the hourly
rate. Meyer v. Sullivan, 958 F.2d 1029, 1033-34 (11th Cir. 1992). The prevailing
market rates must be determined according to rates customarily charged for similarly
complex litigation, and are not limited to rates specifically for social security cases.
Watford v. Heckler, 765 F.2d 1562, 1568 (11th Cir. 1985).
Plaintiff’s counsel is requesting an adjusted hourly rate that is authorized by
applying the cost-of-living adjustment to the $125.00 ceiling for work he performed
-2-
in 2014 and 2015. Because the Commissioner does not object to the adjusted hourly
rate sought and it is within the rates permitted by the EAJA, the Court finds that
$191.08 per hour in 2014 and $189.55 per hour in 2015 are appropriate and
reasonable hourly rates.
Plaintiff’s counsel also has submitted timesheets that
include an itemization of legal services performed. Doc. 29 at 8-9. Counsel spent a
total of 21.5 hours of work in 2014 and 10.55 hours of work in 2015 on Plaintiff’s case.
Id. After reviewing the description of the services provided, the Court also concludes
that the time is reasonable and properly compensable.
ACCORDINGLY, it is hereby
ORDERED:
1.
Plaintiff’s Unopposed Application for Attorney Fees Under the Equal
Access to Justice Act (Doc. 29) is GRANTED. Attorney’s fees in the amount of
$6,107.97 shall be awarded to Plaintiff pursuant to the EAJA, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d).
If the United States Department of the Treasury determines that Plaintiff does not
owe a federal debt, the Government will accept Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA fees
and pay fees directly to Plaintiff’s counsel.
2.
The Clerk is directed to enter judgment for Plaintiff as to attorney’s fees
in the amount of $6,107.97.
-3-
DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on this 28th day of October,
2015.
Copies:
Counsel of record
-4-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?