United States of America et al v. Lee Memorial Health System

Filing 189

ORDERED: Relator's objections (Doc. 180) are SUSTAINED and OVERRULED in part for the reasons discussed on the record. The Court MODIFIES the Protective Order (Doc. 179) and limits the subpoenas to documents sought between 2005 and June 26, 2014. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 12/10/2020. (AEH)

Download PDF
Case 2:14-cv-00437-SPC-NPM Document 189 Filed 12/10/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID 4062 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. ANGELA D’ANNA, Relator, v. Case No.: 2:14-cv-437-FtM-38NPM LEE MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM and CAPE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, INC., Defendants. / ORDER1 Before the Court are Relator’s Rule 72 objections (Doc. 180), and Defendants’ response (Doc. 184), to the granting of a Protective Order (Doc. 179). This Order memorializes the Court’s oral ruling on the objections, which the Court gave at a status conference with the parties on December 9, 2020. For the reasons stated on the record, the Court sustains and overrules Relators objections in part. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: Disclaimer: Documents hyperlinked to CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By using hyperlinks, the Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide, nor does it have any agreements with them. The Court is also not responsible for a hyperlink’s availability and functionality, and a failed hyperlink does not affect this Order. 1 Case 2:14-cv-00437-SPC-NPM Document 189 Filed 12/10/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID 4063 (1) Relator’s objections (Doc. 180) are SUSTAINED and OVERRULED in part for the reasons discussed on the record. (2) The Court MODIFIES the Protective Order (Doc. 179) and limits the subpoenas to documents sought between 2005 and June 26, 2014. DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on December 10, 2020. Copies: All Parties of Record 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?