Calderone et al v. Scott

Filing 98

ORDER granting 90 Defendant's Motion for Protective Order to Preclude Deposition of Sheriff Michael Scott; denying 92 Plaintiffs' Motion for Protective Order Regarding Class Discovery and Motion to Bifurcate Case into Liability and Damages Phase and Incorporated Memorandum of Law. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carol Mirando on 9/19/2016. (HJ)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION KEVIN CALDERONE, GEORGE SCHWING, MICHAEL ZALESKI and SELENA LEE, an individual Plaintiffs, v. Case No: 2:14-cv-519-FtM-29CM MICHAEL SCOTT, Defendant. ORDER This matter comes before the Court upon review of Defendant's Motion for Protective Order to Preclude Deposition of Sheriff Michael Scott (Doc. 90) filed on August 16, 2016, and Plaintiffs’ Motion for Protective Order Regarding Class Discovery and Motion to Bifurcate Case into Liability and Damages Phases and Incorporated Memorandum of Law (Doc. 92) filed on August 30, 2016. Plaintiffs filed a response in opposition to Defendant’s motion for a protective order (Doc. 90) on August 26, 2016. Doc. 91. Defendant filed a response in opposition to Plaintiffs’ motion for a protective order and motion to bifurcate (Doc. 92) on September 13, 2016. Doc. 93. The Court held a hearing on the present motions on September 16, 2016 and heard extensive argument from both sides. Doc. 97. For the reasons stated on the record, Defendant’s motion for a protective order (Doc. 90) is granted, and all of Plaintiffs’ notice, subpoena, and request directed to taking a deposition of Sheriff Michael Scott are quashed. Defendant shall make available for deposition Commander Tracy Estep, the current head of the Sheriff’s Office’s Professional Standards Division, and Annmarie Reno, the Director of Budget Services for the Sheriff’s Office. Doc. 90 at 4. Furthermore, Plaintiffs’ motions for a protective order and to bifurcate (Doc. 92) are denied for the reasons stated on the record. Plaintiffs shall have up to and including October 7, 2016 to respond to Defendant’s First Interrogatories to the opt-in plaintiffs, served on August 1, 2016. The parties also discussed extending the Case Management and Scheduling Order (“CMSO”) deadlines. Doc. 41. The deadlines for the disclosure of expert reports for Plaintiffs and Defendant, and the discovery deadline are extended by two (2) weeks. The deadline for dispositive motions, Daubert motions, and Markman motions is extend by one (1) week. ACCORDINGLY, it is hereby ORDERED: 1. Defendant's Motion for Protective Order to Preclude Deposition of Sheriff Michael Scott (Doc. 90) is GRANTED. 2. Plaintiffs’ notice, subpoena, and request that are related to taking the deposition of Sheriff Michael Scott are QUASHED. 2. Plaintiffs’ Motion for Protective Order Regarding Class Discovery and Motion to Bifurcate Case into Liability and Damages Phases and Incorporated Memorandum of Law (Doc. 92) are DENIED. -2- 4. Plaintiffs shall have up to and including October 7, 2016 to respond to Defendant’s First Interrogatories to the opt-in plaintiffs. 5. The deadline for disclosure of expert reports for Plaintiffs is extended by two (2) weeks. Plaintiffs shall have up to and including September 28, 2016 to disclose expert reports. 6. The deadline for disclosure of expert reports for Defendant is extended by two (2) weeks. Defendant shall have up to and including October 28, 2016 to disclose expert reports. 7. The discovery deadline is extended by two (2) weeks. The parties shall have up to and including November 15, 2016 to conduct discovery. 8. The deadline for dispositive motions and Daubert and Markman motions is extend by one (1) week. The parties shall have up to and including December 8, 2016 to file dispositive motions, Daubert motions, and Markman motions. 9. The Clerk is directed to enter an Amended Case Management and Scheduling Order. 10. All other directives set forth in the Case Management and Scheduling Order (Doc. 41) remain unchanged. DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on this 19th day of September, 2016. -3- Copies: Counsel of record -4-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?