Inglis v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Filing
115
ORDER granting 106 Emergency Motion of Witness Janice Evans and Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. for Protective Order to Stay September 19, 2016 Deposition of Janice Evans, with Incorporated Memorandum of Law. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carol Mirando on 9/13/16.(HJ)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
FORT MYERS DIVISION
RICHARD K. INGLIS, as Special
Trustee to the trust under the will of
Rosa B. Schweiker, dated February 2,
1961, the Frederick W. Berlinger
Revocable Deed of Trust, dated
10/17/1991, as amended and restated.
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No: 2:14-cv-677-FtM-29CM
WELLS FARGO BANK N.A.,
Defendant.
ORDER
This matter comes before the Court upon review of the Emergency Motion of
Witness Janice Evans and Defendant Wells Fargos Bank, N.A. for Protective Order
to Stay September 19, 2016 Deposition of Janice Evans, with Incorporated
Memorandum of Law (Doc. 106) filed on September 8, 2016. Defendant and Ms.
Janice Evans seek to stay the deposition of Ms. Evans until either her medical
problems are resolved or she returns from maternity leave. Doc. 106 at 1. Plaintiff
filed a response in opposition on September 12, 2016. Doc. 111.
Janice Evans is Defendant’s employee and a fact witness in this matter. Doc.
106 at 2. On September 7, 2016, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Filing Proof of Service
(Doc. 102) that shows Plaintiff’s service of subpoena to Ms. Evans. Doc. 102-1. The
subpoena demands that Ms. Evans testify at a deposition on September 19, 2016.
Id.
On September 8, 2016, Defendant and Ms. Evans filed this present motion to
stay Ms. Evans’ deposition, explaining that she is currently on maternity leave and
is suffering from pregnancy-related health issues. Doc. 106 at 1. Defendant and
Ms. Evans state that Defendant will produce Ms. Evans for a deposition before the
discovery deadline 1 “if her health status changes and her doctor gives her permission
to appear for her deposition.”
Id. at 3. If Ms. Evans cannot appear during the
discovery period, Defendant and Ms. Evans promise that Defendant will produce her
for a deposition within fourteen (14) days of her return from maternity leave or of
Id. at 3-4.
trial. 2
Plaintiff opposes the Motion on the ground that Ms. Evans’
testimony is highly relevant, as it goes to Defendant’s affirmative defenses. Doc. 111
at 3. Plaintiff argues that her deposition should take place as scheduled because her
medical condition is not life-threatening. Id.
Rule 26(c) provides that “a party or any person” may move for a protective
order to protect a person from “annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue
burden or expense.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c). The court, upon showing of good cause,
may issue a protective order including “specifying terms, including time and place or
the allocation of expenses, for the disclosure or discovery” and “forbidding the
disclosure or discovery.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c). “Rule 26(c) gives the district court
discretionary power to fashion a protective order.” Farnsworth v. Procter & Gamble,
Co., 758 F.2d 1545, 1548 (11th Cir. 1985).
1
The discovery deadline is October 3, 2016. Doc. 85.
Ms. Evans is on maternity leave beginning on August 26, 2016. Doc. 106 at
2. Her expected date of delivery is November 9, 2016. Id. at 4. The trial in this
matter is to commence on March 6, 2017. Doc. 85 at 2.
2
-2-
If a party seeks to delay a deposition on medical grounds, the moving party
must make “a specific and documented factual showing that the deposition will be
dangerous to the deponent’s health.” Arnold v. Wausau Underwriters Ins. Co., No.
13-60299-CIV, 2013 WL 5488520, at *2 (S.D. Fla. Sept. 30, 2013). The burden of a
party seeking to delay or prohibit his own deposition is heavier than that of a witness
seeking the same. Id. Upon factual showing, the court will examine the deposing
party’s interest in conducting discovery for trial against the harm the deposition will
cause to a person or party to be deposed. Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. Southeast Floating
Docks, Inc., 231 F.R.D. 426, 429 (M.D. Fla. 2005).
Here, the Court finds that the harm the deposition will cause to Ms. Evans is
greater than Plaintiff’s interest in deposing Ms. Evans on September 19, 2016. Ms.
Evans is seeking a protective order to stay her own deposition and has proven her
medical conditions by submitting her treating physician’s letter. Doc. 106-2. The
letter clearly states that Ms. Evans is to remain home until her expected date of
delivery and that attending a deposition may endanger her and her unborn child.
Id. Although this will cause a delay in her deposition, as Defendant and Ms. Evans
promise, Plaintiff will have an opportunity to depose her once her medical issues are
resolved or she returns from her maternity leave. Doc. 106 at 3-4.
Plaintiff argues that this showing is insufficient because Ms. Evans’ medical
condition is not life-threatening. Doc. 111 at 3. Plaintiff believes that a moving
party carries a burden of establishing “a serious [or] life threatening medical
condition to preclude the taking of a deposition” and cites to Dunford v. Rolly Marine
-3-
Service Co. Id.; 233 F.R.D. 635, 637 (S.D. Fla. 2005). The standard employed in
Dunford is not applicable to this case on two grounds: (1) a party in Dunford sought
to prohibit, not stay, the deposition, and (2) a party, not a third-party witness, moved
for a protective order.
Id.
Here, because Ms. Evans, a third-party witness, is
moving for a protective order and is seeking to stay the deposition instead of
prohibiting it, the Court finds that she has made an appropriate factual showing to
stay her deposition. Doc. 106.
ACCORDINGLY, it is hereby
ORDERED:
1.
The Emergency Motion of Witness Janice Evans and Defendant Wells
Fargos Bank, N.A. for Protective Order to Stay September 19, 2016 Deposition of
Janice Evans, with Incorporated Memorandum of Law (Doc. 106) is GRANTED.
2. Defendant is directed to immediately notify Plaintiff and to produce Ms.
Janice Evans for her deposition when her medical problems are resolved or she
returns from maternity leave, whichever is earlier.
DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on this 13th day of September,
2016.
Copies:
Counsel of record
-4-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?