Judy v. Dolphin Key Resort, LLC

Filing 19

ORDER granting 18 the Joint Motion for Approval and Entry of Consent Decree. The Consent Decree is APPROVED and ENTERED. The Court does not retain jurisdiction over this matter for the purpose of enforcement of the settlement; This action is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly, terminate any pending motions and deadlines, and close the file. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 6/9/2015. (LMF)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION JEFFREY JOEL JUDY, Plaintiff, v. Case No:2:15-cv-125-FtM-38-SPC-CM DOLPHIN KEY RESORT, LLC, Defendant. / FINAL ORDER APPROVING AND ENTERING CONSENT DECREE AND DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE1 This matter is before the Court upon the Parties’ Joint Motion for Approval and Entry of Consent Decree and to Dismiss with Prejudice, filed April 28, 2015. (Doc. #18). The Court has carefully reviewed the Consent Decree and is otherwise fully advised. Plaintiff brought suit against Defendant, a hotel, on February 26, 2014 for violations of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act allegedly resulting in Plaintiff’s difficulty accessing Defendant’s goods and services because of architectural barriers. (Doc. #1). Defendants filed a Notice of Settlement (Doc. #16), after which the Court ordered this case to be administratively closed (Doc. #17). The Parties now move the Court to enter a Consent Decree and to Dismiss with Prejudice. Although the Parties request that 1 Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users’ convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other Web sites, this court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court. the Court maintain jurisdiction over the matter, the Consent Decree states the facility is ADA compliant. As a general rule, this Court does not retain jurisdiction over matters that are resolved and declines to do so in this case. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: (1) The Joint Motion for Approval and Entry of Consent Decree (Doc. #18) is hereby GRANTED; (2) The Consent Decree is APPROVED and ENTERED. (3) The Court does not retain jurisdiction over this matter for the purpose of enforcement of the settlement; (4) This action is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly, terminate any pending motions and deadlines, and close the file. DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida this 9th day of June 2015. Copies: All Parties of Record

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?