Wright et al v. Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. et al
Filing
94
ORDER. Plaintiffs and Defendant Dyck O'Neal shall each file a brief, not to exceed five (5) pages in length, on or before January 4, 2017, addressing why this Court should or should not dismiss Count II of the Complaint on the ground that th ere is no private cause of action under the Florida Consumer Collection Protections Act for not serving a notice of assignment in accordance with Florida Statute § 559.715. Until the parties brief this issue, the Court reserves ruling on DONI's motion for judgment on the pleadings. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 12/22/2016. (LMF)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
FORT MYERS DIVISION
MOLLY WRIGHT, TRISHA BREMER,
SHAWN FISHER, KIMBERLY FISHER,
ANGELA MCDOUGALL, THOMAS
PATTERSON, MICHAEL PIASECKI,
CHRIS A. WIGLESWORTH and
DOROTHY WILLIS, on behalf of
themselves and all others similarly
situated
Plaintiffs,
v.
Case No: 2:15-cv-249-FtM-38MRM
DYCK-O’NEAL, INC. and LAW
OFFICES OF DANIEL C.
CONSUEGRA, P.L.,
Defendants.
/
ORDER1
This matter comes before the Court on review of Defendant Dyck-O’Neal, Inc.’s
(“DONI”) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. #87). This case involves the Fair
Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”) and Florida Consumer Collection Protections
Act (“FCCPA”). Plaintiffs contend that DONI violated each statute by collecting on alleged
debts before Florida Statute § 559.715’s thirty-day notice of assignment period expired.
(Doc. #1 at ¶¶ 45-46).
1
DONI moves for a judgment on the pleadings, arguing that
Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or websites. These
hyperlinks are provided only for users’ convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in
CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other websites, this Court does not endorse,
recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their
websites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their websites. The
Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a
hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court.
Plaintiffs’ claims fail as a matter of law because § 559.715 does not create a condition
precedent to debt collection activity. (Doc. #87 at 2). Plaintiffs disagree.
At this time, the Court is inclined to dismiss the FCCPA claim (Count II) on a ground
not raised by the parties – namely, that there is no private cause of action under the
FCCPA for not serving a notice of assignment under Florida Statute § 559.715. See Trent
v. Mortgage Elec. Registration Sys., Inc., 618 F. Supp. 2d 1356, 1364 (M.D. Fla. 2007),
aff’d, 288 F. App’x 571 (11th Cir. 2008); Schmidt v. Synergentic Comm’ns, Inc., No. 2:14cv-539, 2015 WL 248635, at *3 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 20, 2015). In fact, the Court previously
dismissed the FCCPA claim as against Law Offices of Daniel C. Consuegra for this
reason. 2 (Doc. #36). Because the parties have not address this issue, the Court requires
supplement briefing before deciding DONI’s pending motion.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED:
Plaintiffs and Defendant Dyck O’Neal shall each file a brief, not to exceed five (5)
pages in length, on or before January 4, 2017, addressing why this Court should or
should not dismiss Count II of the Complaint on the ground that there is no private cause
of action under the Florida Consumer Collection Protections Act for not serving a notice
of assignment in accordance with Florida Statute § 559.715. Until the parties brief this
issue, the Court reserves ruling on DONI’s motion for judgment on the pleadings.
DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida this 21st day of December, 2016.
Copies: All Parties of Record
2
Plaintiffs initially filed this against DONI and Law Offices of Daniel C. Consuegra. (Doc. #1). Since then,
Plaintiffs and Law Offices of Daniel C. Consuegra have stipulated to dismissing this matter as between
them. (Doc. #91).
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?