Popoli v. Ft. Myers Lodge #1899 Loyal Order of Moose, Inc.

Filing 45

OPINION AND ORDER granting 42 Motion for dismissal with prejudice and settlement approval; adopting and incorporating 43 Report and Recommendations; approving settlement as fair and reasonable. The Clerk shall enter judgment dismissing the case with prejudice, terminate all pending deadlines and motions (terminating 12 Motion to Dismiss), and close the file. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 3/7/2016. (RKR)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION JAYE POPOLI, on her own behalf and all similarly situated individuals, Plaintiff, v. Case No: 2:15-cv-311-FtM-29CM FT. MYERS LODGE #1899 LOYAL ORDER OF MOOSE, INC., a Florida non profit corporation, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on consideration of the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. #43), filed March 2, 2016, recommending that the parties' Amended Joint Motion for Dismissal With Prejudice and Settlement Approval (Doc. #42) be granted, the Settlement Agreement (Doc. #39-1) be approved, and the case dismissed. On the same day, the parties filed a Joint Notice of Non-Opposition to Report and Recommendation (Doc. #44) expressing no objections. After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject or modify the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1112 (1983). In the absence of specific objections, there is no requirement that a district judge review factual findings de novo, Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993), and the court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings and recommendations. 636(b)(1)(C). 28 U.S.C. § The district judge reviews legal conclusions de novo, even in the absence of an objection. See Cooper-Houston v. Southern Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994); Castro Bobadilla v. Reno, 826 F. Supp. 1428, 1431-32 (S.D. Fla. 1993), aff’d, 28 F.3d 116 (11th Cir. 1994) (Table). After conducting an independent examination of the file, and finding that the $43,000.00 in attorney’s fees was separately negotiated, the Court agrees that the settlement may be approved as reasonable on its face, and without separately considering the reasonableness of the fee paid to plaintiff’s counsel. Bonetti v. Embarq Mgmt. Co., 715 F. Supp. 2d 1222, 1228 (M.D. Fla. 2009). The Court accepts the Report and Recommendation of the magistrate judge. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. #43) is hereby adopted and the findings incorporated herein. 2. The parties' Amended Joint Motion for Dismissal With Prejudice and Settlement Approval (Doc. #42) is granted and the - 2 - Settlement Agreement and Release (Doc. #39-1) is approved as a fair and reasonable resolution of a bona fide dispute. 3. The Clerk shall enter judgment dismissing the case with prejudice, terminate all deadlines and motions, and close the file. DONE and ORDERED at Fort Myers, Florida, this March, 2016. Copies: Hon. Carol Mirando United States Magistrate Judge Counsel of Record Unrepresented parties - 3 - 7th day of

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?