Jablonski v. Martin et al
Filing
84
ORDER denying as moot 82 Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel; denying as moot 83 Plaintiff's Motion to Strike the Court's Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carol Mirando on 11/14/2016. (HJ)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
FORT MYERS DIVISION
EDWARD J. JABLONSKI,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No: 2:15-cv-383-FtM-38CM
CHRISTOPHER W. MARTIN,
TODD M. LONERGAN, MARTIN,
DISIERE, JEFFERSON &
WISDOM and TRAVELERS
COMPANIES, INC.,
Defendants.
ORDER
This matter comes before the Court upon review of Plaintiff's Motion for
Appointment of Counsel (Doc. 82) filed on October 26, 2016 and Motion to Strike the
Court’s Order (Doc. 83) filed on November 7, 2016.
Plaintiff seeks (1) the
appointment of counsel and (2) to strike the Order (Doc. 78) entered on September
15, 2016 and to reopen this matter.
his motions.
Plaintiff does not show any legal basis to support
Docs. 82, 83.
On August 1, 2016, United States District Judge Sheri Polster Chappell
dismissed this matter for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the Court’s Orders, the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Local Rules of this District.
Doc. 70 at 3.
On August 2, 2016, the Clerk of Court terminated any pending motions or deadlines,
entered judgment, and closed this case.
Doc. 71.
Plaintiff attempted to reopen this
matter, which Judge Chappell denied on September 15, 2016 and September 29,
2016.
Docs. 78, 81.
In light of Judge Chappell’s Orders, Plaintiff’s motions are
denied as moot.
ACCORDINGLY, it is hereby
ORDERED:
1.
Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Doc. 82) is DENIED as
2.
Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike the Court’s Order (Doc. 83) is DENIED as
moot.
moot.
DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on this 14th day of November,
2016.
Copies:
Counsel of record
Edward J. Jablonski pro se
2886 Coral Way
Punta Gorda, FL 33950
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?