Garverick v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 34

ORDER granting 33 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Remand Under Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and this action is REMANDED for further proceedings. See Order for details. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly, and close the file. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carol Mirando on 4/22/2016. (ANW)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION JANINE GARVERICK, Plaintiff, v. Case No: 2:15-cv-385-FtM-CM COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. ORDER Before the Court is Defendant’s Unopposed Motion for Remand Under Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (Doc. 33), filed on April 20, 2016. Defendant requests that the Court remand this case to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. Plaintiff does not oppose the motion. Pursuant to Title 42, United States Code, Section 405(g), the Court may reverse the decision of the Commissioner with or without remanding the case for a rehearing. Upon due consideration, Defendant’s motion will be granted. ACCORDINGLY, it is hereby ORDERED: 1. Unopposed Motion for Remand Under Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (Doc. 33) is GRANTED. The decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and this action is REMANDED under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to the Commissioner for the Administrative Law Judge to: a. Further consider the claimant’s maximum residual functional capacity with specific reference to the medical opinion evidence of record; b. Further evaluate the claimant’s subjective complaints; c. If warranted, obtain evidence from a vocational expert; and d. Take any further action necessary. 2. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close the file. DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on this 22nd day of April, 2016. Copies: Counsel of record -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?