Harris v. Soto et al

Filing 5

ORDER OF DISMISSAL denying 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; dismissing case without prejudice. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly, send Plaintiff a copy of the pre-printed 28 U.S.C. § 2254 application, and close the case. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 10/13/2015. (RKR)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION GREGORY HARRIS, Petitioner, v. Case No: 2:15-cv-617-FtM-99CM BERTILA SOTO, Chief Judge, ROSA RODRIGUEZ, Judge, THOMAS REBULL, Judge, ANTONIO MARIN, Judge, MAGALIE RODRIGUEZ, DAVID GLANTZ, GRISKA MENA RODRIGUEZ, STEVEN DEMANOVICH, NATALIE SNYDER, KELLY FOSTER, JELANI DAVIS, JOHNNY BROWDY, FREDERICKA ROBERTS, CHEALY MILLER, Chief of Police, NIKEGA HILL, and JEFFERY FULKNER, Respondents. ORDER OF DISMISSAL This matter comes before the Court upon a “Writ to Distress Bonds Writ of Conspiracy to Kidnappe [sic] with Fraudulent Intent and Breach of the Peace” and an application to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Gregory Harris on October 5, 2015 (Doc. 1; Doc. 2). Plaintiff's complaint concerns the defendants’ actions during the criminal proceedings that led to his current incarceration, and each defendant is either a judge, assistant attorney general, assistant state attorney, public defender, or police officer (Doc. 2). Petitioner appears to assert that these defendants conspired to unconstitutionally convict and sentence him. Id. Plaintiff is currently incarcerated at Franklin Correctional Institution, serving sentences for child abuse and grand theft. Id. Because Plaintiff has filed three or more suits that were dismissed on the grounds that they were frivolous, malicious, or failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and this case is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). I. Legal Standards Section 1915(g) of Title 28 limits a prisoner’s ability to bring a civil action in forma pauperis under certain circumstances: In no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action or appeal a judgment in a civil action or proceeding under this section if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Thus, if a prisoner has had three or more cases dismissed for one of the recited reasons, he cannot proceed in forma pauperis and must pay the filing fee in full at the time the lawsuit is initiated. II. Dupree v. Palmer, 284 F.3d 1234, 1236 (11th Cir. 2002). Analysis The Court takes judicial notice of filings previously brought by Plaintiff in the Southern District of Florida that were dismissed on the grounds that they were frivolous, malicious, or failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted: (1) 1:11-cv-22828- - 2 - MGC; (2) 1:12-cv-23944-JEM; (3) 1:13-cv-22314-RNS; and (4) 1:13-cv22512-KMW. In addition, the Court has found three cases from the Southern District of Florida, and one case from the Northern District of Florida which were dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See SDFL Case Nos. 1:13-cv-24417-KMM, 1:13-cv-14422-KMW, 1:13-cv-24422KMW and NDFL Case No. 4:15-cv-366-RH-CAS. Plaintiff does not allege that he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury, and none of the defendants named in his pleading appear to operate from Franklin Correctional Institution. Based upon the prior dismissals and because Plaintiff is not currently under imminent danger of serious physical injury, his application to proceed in forma pauperis is denied and this action is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff may initiate a new civil rights action by filing a new civil rights complaint form and paying the full filing fee at the time he files the action. Finally, to the extent Plaintiff asserts that he is in custody in violation of the Constitution, he must seek relief through a petition for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 1 ACCORDINGLY, it is hereby ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2) is DENIED. 2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice. 1 The Court takes no position as to the potential merits of such a petition. - 3 - 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate all pending motions, enter judgment accordingly, and close this case. 4. The Clerk is also directed to send Plaintiff a copy of the pre-printed 28 U.S.C. § 2254 application. DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on this of October, 2015. SA: OrlP-4 Copies: Gregory Harris Encl: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition - 4 - 13th day

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?