Shawna Raye, LLC et al v. Doe
ORDER adopting 17 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 16 MOTION for default judgment against John Doe filed by In The Matter Of The Complaint Of Shawna Raye, LLC, As Owner and William Comeaux and Ruth Anne Comeaus, As Owners Pro Hac Vice of the 2006 47' Na. The Report and Recommendation 17 is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED and the findings are incorporated herein. Petitioners' Motion for Entry of Final Default Judgment 16 is GRANTED. The Clerk shall enter default judgment in favor of Petitioners Shawna Raye, LLC, as owner, and William Comeaux and Ruth Anne Comeaux, as owners pro hac vice, of the 2006 47' NAUTITECH VESSEL (hull identification number FRNAUN0192G606), her engines, tackles, appurtenances, etc., against all claimants who have not timely filed claims or answers in response to Petitioners' Complaint for Exoneration from or Limitation of Liability 1 .Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 6/28/2016. (LMF)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
FORT MYERS DIVISION
IN RE: IN THE MATTER OF THE
COMPLAINT OF SHAWNA RAYE, LLC,
AS OWNER AND WILLIAM COMEAUX
AND RUTH ANNE COMEAUS, AS
OWNERS PRO HAC VICE OF THE
2006 47’ NAUTITECH VESSEL
SHAWNA RAYE, LLC, WILLIAM
COMEAUX and RUTH ANN
Case No: 2:15-cv-770-FtM-99CM
This matter comes before the Court on consideration of United States Magistrate
Judge Carol Mirando's Report and Recommendation (Doc. #17) filed on May 9, 2016.
Judge Mirando recommends granting Petitioners’ Motion for Entry of Final Default
Judgment (Doc. #16). No objections were filed, and the time to do so has now expired.
Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites.
These hyperlinks are provided only for users’ convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked
documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other Web sites, this Court
does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they
provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their
Web sites. The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus,
the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion
of the Court.
A district judge "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or
recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). If no specific
objections to findings of fact are filed, the district judge is not required to conduct a de
novo review of those findings. See Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir.
1993). However, the district judge must review legal conclusions de novo, even in the
absence of an objection. See Cooper-Houston v. Southern Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604
(11th Cir. 1994)
After careful consideration of the Report and Recommendation and an
independent review of the file, the Court adopts, accepts, and approves the Report and
Accordingly, it is now
1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. #17) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED
and the findings are incorporated herein.
2. Petitioners’ Motion for Entry of Final Default Judgment (Doc. #16) is
3. The Clerk shall enter default judgment in favor of Petitioners Shawna Raye,
LLC, as owner, and William Comeaux and Ruth Anne Comeaux, as owners pro
hac vice, of the 2006 47’ NAUTITECH VESSEL (hull identification number
FRNAUN0192G606), her engines, tackles, appurtenances, etc., against all
claimants who have not timely filed claims or answers in response to
Petitioners’ Complaint for Exoneration from or Limitation of Liability (Doc. #1).
DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida, this 28th day of June, 2016.
Copies: All Parties of Record
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?