Bailem v. State of Florida
Filing
55
OPINION AND ORDER denying re: 52 MOTION for miscellaneous relief, specifically for access to court to utilize the electronically filed documents in the appellant's case for his coa. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 8/9/2017. (SLU)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
FORT MYERS DIVISION
TREMAINE L. BAILEM,
Petitioner,
v.
Case No: 2:16-cv-18-FtM-38MRM
STATE OF FLORIDA and
SECRETARY, DOC,
Respondents.
/
OPINION AND ORDER1
This matter comes before the Court on the Petitioner Tremaine Bailem's Motion
for Access to Court to Utilize the Court's Electronically Filed Documents for his Certificate
of Appeal (COA) (Doc. #52) filed on July 27, 2017. On June 26, 2017, the Court denied
Bailem’s COA. (Doc. #41, at 15). Since Bailem was denied a COA, his Motion for access
to the Court’s electronic filing system to support his appeal is due to be denied.
Accordingly, it is now
ORDERED:
The Petitioner Tremaine Bailem's Motion for Access to Court to Utilize the Court's
Electronically Filed Documents for Appeal (Doc. #52) is DENIED.
1
Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or
websites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users’ convenience. Users are
cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By
allowing hyperlinks to other websites, this Court does not endorse, recommend, approve,
or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their websites.
Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their websites.
The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink.
Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does
not affect the opinion of the Court.
DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida this 9th day of August, 2017.
Copies:
Tremaine Bailem
All Parties of Record
SA: FtMP-2
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?