Barnes v. Lane Valente Industries, Inc.
ORDER adopting 26 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 25 Joint MOTION for Settlement Agreement Approval and Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice filed by Paul Barnes. United States Magistrate Judge Carol Mirando's Report and R ecommendation 26 is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED and the findings incorporated herein. The parties' Joint Motion for Settlement Agreement Approval 25 is GRANTED and the Settlement Agreement [25-1] is approved as a fair and reasonable resolution of this FLSA dispute. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment accordingly, dismiss the case with prejudice, terminate all deadlines and motions, and close the file.Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 10/18/2016. (LMF)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
FORT MYERS DIVISION
Case No: 2:16-cv-174-FtM-38CM
LANE VALENTE INDUSTRIES, INC.,
This matter comes before the Court on United States Magistrate Judge Carol
Mirando's Report and Recommendation filed on October 13, 2016. (Doc. #26). Judge
Mirando recommends granting the parties’ Joint Motion for Settlement Agreement
Approval (Doc. #25) and approving their Settlement Agreement (Doc. #25-1) as a fair and
reasonable resolution of a bona fide dispute under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29
U.S.C. § 201 et seq. The parties have filed a Joint Notice of Non-Objection to the Report
and Recommendation. (Doc. #27). Thus, the Report and Recommendation is ripe for
After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and
recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject, or modify the magistrate judge's
report and recommendation. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Williams v. Wainwright,
Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or websites. These
hyperlinks are provided only for users’ convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in
CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other websites, this Court does not endorse,
recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their
websites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their websites. The
Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a
hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court.
681 F.2d 732, 732 (11th Cir. 1982). In the absence of specific objections, there is no
requirement that a district judge review factual findings de novo, Garvey v. Vaughn, 993
F.2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993), and the court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole
or in part, the findings and recommendations, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The district judge
reviews legal conclusions de novo even in the absence of an objection. See CooperHouston v. Southern Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994).
After examining the file carefully and independently, and upon considering Judge
Mirando's findings and recommendations, the Court accepts and adopts the Report and
Accordingly, it is now
1. United States Magistrate Judge Carol Mirando's Report and Recommendation
(Doc. #26) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED and the findings incorporated herein.
2. The parties' Joint Motion for Settlement Agreement Approval (Doc. #25) is
GRANTED and the Settlement Agreement (Doc. #25-1) is approved as a fair
and reasonable resolution of this FLSA dispute.
3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment accordingly, dismiss the
case with prejudice, terminate all deadlines and motions, and close the file.
DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida this 18th day of October, 2016.
Copies: All Parties of Record
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?