Stuart C. Irby Company v. Western Surety Company et al
Filing
69
OPINION AND ORDER granting 64 Motion for voluntary dismissal, and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2), defendants Brooks & Freund, LLC, and Western Surety Company, are dismissed with prejudice. Finding no just cause for delay, the Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and terminate these defendants on the docket. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 3/9/2017. (RKR)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
FORT MYERS DIVISION
STUART C. IRBY COMPANY,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No: 2:16-cv-211-FtM-99CM
WESTERN
SURETY
COMPANY,
BROOKS & FREUND, L.L.C., and
BC POWER, INC.,
Defendants.
OPINION AND ORDER
This matter comes before the Court on plaintiff’s Motion for
Voluntary
Dismissal
of
Plaintiff’s
Claims
Against
Defendants
Western Surety Company and Brooks & Freund, LLC pursuant to Fed.
R.
Civ.
P.
41(a)(2)
(Doc.
#64)
filed
on
February
6,
2017.
Defendant BC Power, Inc. filed a Response in Opposition (Doc. #65)
on February 8, 2017.
For the reasons set forth below, the motion
is granted.
I.
Plaintiff Stuart C. Irby, Company (Irby or plaintiff) moves
pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) to voluntarily
dismiss
its
claims
against
defendants
Western
Surety
Company
(Western) and Brooks & Freund, LLC (Brooks) with prejudice as these
parties have settled.
The remaining defendant, BC Power, Inc. (BC
Power), opposes the dismissal, arguing prejudice.
Irby filed a four-count Second Amended Complaint (Doc. #17)
on July 8, 2016, alleging that it furnished electrical materials
to
BC
Power
Agreement.
as
the
electrical
subcontractor
under
a
Credit
BC Power was not fully paid by defendant Brooks, the
general contractor on the construction project, and BC Power is
owed a principal amount of $685,967.42.
BC Power in turn did not
fully pay Irby the unpaid principal amount for materials in the
amount of $46,145.05.
Thus, BC Power assigned to Irby its accounts
receivables for the principal amount of $685,967.42 through an
Assignment of Accounts Receivable.
22, 26.)
(Doc. #17, ¶¶ 2, 11-14, 19-
Although referenced and attached to the Second Amended
Complaint, Doc. #17-6, Exh. 6, plaintiff’s claims against BC Power
are not based on a breach of the Assignment.
Plaintiff’s first and third claims are against Brooks only,
and the second claim is against Western and Brooks only.
Under
the second and third claims, plaintiff alleges that it was assigned
BC
Power’s
accounts
receivables
representing
the
BC
Power
principal amount owed by Brooks to BC Power; plaintiff is therefore
asserting claims two and three against Western and Brooks on behalf
of BC Power as assignee to recover all amounts owed to BC Power
under the subcontract.
(Doc. #17, ¶¶ 39-40, 46-47.)
The fourth
claim asserts a breach of the Credit Agreement against BC Power
for failing to fully pay for the materials received.
also
filed
a
Crossclaim
subcontract agreement.
against
(Doc. #25.) 1
1
BC
Power
breach
of
a
Plaintiff states that once
Plaintiff is not named as the
accounts receivable in the Crossclaim.
- 2 -
for
Brooks has
assignee
of
BC
Power’s
Brooks and Western are dismissed, Irby’s claim against BC Power
for breach of the Credit Agreement, and Brooks’s Crossclaim against
BC
Power
for
breach
of
a
subcontract
agreement,
will
remain
pending.
BC Power filed a motion to set aside assignment, seeking to
set aside as void or voidable the Assignment based upon lack of
consideration, unconscionability, fraud in the inducement, and
mistake.
The Court denied the motion, finding that procedurally
BC Power’s arguments were improperly raised and out of time.
(Doc.
#61.)
II.
Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure governs the
dismissal of actions.
A plaintiff may dismiss an action without
an order of the court at any time before the adverse party has
served an answer or moved for summary judgment.
41(a)(1).
Fed. R. Civ. P.
If, as is the case here, the adverse party has served
an answer, dismissal is available to a plaintiff only upon order
of the court and upon such terms and conditions as the court deems
appropriate.
Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2).
“[I]n most cases, a
[voluntary] dismissal should be granted unless the defendant will
suffer clear legal prejudice, other than the mere prospect of a
subsequent lawsuit, as a result.”
McCants v. Ford Motor Co.,
Inc., 781 F.2d 855, 856–57 (11th Cir. 1986) (emphasis in original).
Critical to this question is whether BC Power will “lose any
- 3 -
substantial
right
by
the
dismissal.”
Pontenberg
v.
Boston
Scientific Corp., 252 F.3d 1253, 1255 (11th Cir. 2001).
BC Power argues that it will be prejudiced if Brooks and
Western are dismissed from this case because BC Power “has been
told by the other parties that it will not receive any of the
settlement proceeds.
BC Power will be left with nothing and no
legal remedy in the present suit.”
(Doc. #65 at 3.)
Yet, based
upon the Assignment (Doc. #17-6, Exh. 6, Assignment of Accounts
Receivable), all rights, title, and interest to the amounts owed
to BC Power on the accounts receivable was assigned to Irby, and
there is nothing indicating – and BC Power does not argue – that
Irby could not settle the BC Power’s claims with Brooks and
Western.
Although BC Power believes that Irby has acted in
contradiction
of
the
parties’
intentions
in
entering
in
the
Assignment and that Irby has otherwise acted against BC Power’s
interests, as the Court noted in its previous Opinion and Order,
BC Power could have raised these arguments by filing a counterclaim
against Irby or stating its defenses as affirmative defenses in
its Answer, which BC Power has failed to do. 2
(Doc. #61 at 3.)
BC Power further argues that if this Court allows dismissal
of Brooks and Western, BC Power’s claims against Brooks will be
extinguished as Irby is attempting to settle BC Power’s claims
2
The Court is aware that BC Power has filed a motion for
leave to amend its answer and add a counterclaim against Irby (Doc.
#66), but dismissal of Brooks and Western will not prejudice BC
Power’s request to amend.
- 4 -
against Brooks relating to the amounts owed by Brooks to BC Power
to the detriment of BC Power.
The Court is unaware of any claim
by BC Power against Brooks for any amounts owed, presumably because
any such claim was assigned to Irby.
Thus, BC Power has failed
to establish that it will lose substantial rights as a result of
a Rule 41(a)(2) voluntary dismissal.
Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
Plaintiff’s Motion for Voluntary Dismissal of Plaintiff’s
Claims Against Defendants Western Surety Company and Brooks &
Freund, LLC pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2) (Doc. #64) is
GRANTED.
Pursuant to Federal R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2), defendants
Brooks & Freund, LLC, and Western Surety Company, are DISMISSED
with prejudice.
Finding no just cause for delay, the Clerk shall
enter judgment accordingly and terminate these defendants on the
docket.
This case otherwise remains pending.
DONE and ORDERED at Fort Myers, Florida, this
March, 2017.
Copies:
Counsel of Record
- 5 -
9th
day of
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?