Goros v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada

Filing 38

ORDER granting 37 Plaintiff George T. Goros and Defendant Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada's Joint Motion to Withdraw Defendant's Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Non-Taxable Costs and Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice. Defendant's Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Non-Taxable Costs 34 is DENIED as moot. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter an amended judgment accordingly and close the file. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 10/6/2017. (LMF)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION GEORGE T. GOROS, Plaintiff, v. Case No: 2:16-cv-233-FtM-38CM SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA, Defendant. / ORDER1 This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff George Goros and Defendant Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada’s Joint Motion to Withdraw Defendant’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Non-Taxable Costs and Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice. (Doc. 37). The parties jointly move the Court to treat as withdrawn Defendant’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Non-Taxable Costs (Doc. 34). They also stipulate to dismissing this action. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) allows a plaintiff to dismiss an action voluntarily if a stipulation of dismissal is signed by all parties who have appeared. This dismissal is effective upon filing and requires no further action by the Court. See Anago 1 Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or websites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users’ convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other websites, this Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their websites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their websites. The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court. Franchising, Inc. v. Shaz, LLC, 677 F.3d 1272, 1278 (11th Cir. 2012). Here, the parties stipulate to dismissing this case with prejudice and with each party to bear its own fees and costs. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: (1) Plaintiff George T. Goros and Defendant Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada’s Joint Motion to Withdraw Defendant’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Non-Taxable Costs and Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice (Doc. 37) is GRANTED. (2) This action is DISMISSED with prejudice. (3) Defendant’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Non-Taxable Costs (Doc. 34) is DENIED as moot. (4) The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter an amended judgment accordingly and close the file. DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida this 6th day of October 2017. Copies: All Parties of Record 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?