Phoenix Entertainment Partners, LLC v. CocoSally's Sports Bar and Grill, Inc. et al

Filing 11

ORDER granting 10 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to Effect Service. Plaintiff shall have up to and including December 20, 2016, during which to effectuate service of process. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carol Mirando on 10/3/2016. (LS)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION PHOENIX ENTERTAINMENT PARTNERS, LLC, a North Carolina LLC Plaintiff, v. Case No: 2:16-cv-400-FtM-99CM COCOSALLY’S SPORTS BAR AND GRILL, INC. and EDWARD WILLIAMS, Defendants. ORDER This matter comes before the Court upon review of Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time to Effect Service (Doc. 10) filed on September 21, 2016. Plaintiff filed its Complaint in this matter on May 24, 2016. Doc. 1. Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff was required to serve Defendants on or before August 22, 2016. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Plaintiff now seeks an extension of time up to and including December 20, 2016 to effect service of process on Defendants. Doc. 10 at 1. Plaintiff details the efforts of its process server of various unsuccessful attempts to serve Defendants since May 27, 2016. Id. Plaintiff requests the extension to further investigate Defendants’ whereabouts and effect service on them. Id. at 3. Upon review of the motion, the Court finds that Plaintiff has diligently attempted to timely serve Defendants and has demonstrated good cause for its failure to do so. The Court therefore will grant the motion and extend the time for service. ACCORDINGLY, it is hereby ORDERED: Motion for Extension of Time to Effect Service (Doc. 10) is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall have up to and including December 20, 2016, during which to effectuate service of process. DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on this 3rd day of October, 2016. Copies: Counsel of record -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?