Cole v. Halsted Financial Services, LLC et al

Filing 36

ORDER granting 35 Plaintiff's Request for Entry of Default against Defendant Syed Ali. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter a default against Defendant Syed Ali. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mac R. McCoy on 5/24/2017. (JTM)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
FORT MYERS DIVISION
CHARLES COLE,
Plaintiff,
v.

Case No: 2:16-cv-754-FtM-99MRM

HALSTED FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC,
SYED ALI, PRAN NAVANANDAN and
DOE 1-5,
Defendants.
/
ORDER
This cause comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Request for Entry of Default against
Defendant Syed Ali (Doc. 35) filed on May 5, 2017. Plaintiff requests that the Court enter a
default against Defendant for failure to plead or otherwise defend pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
55(a). (Doc. 35 at 1). Plaintiff filed a Proof of Service (Doc. 34) and attached an Affidavit in
Support (Doc. 35-1).
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a), “[w]hen a party against whom a judgment for
affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend, and that failure is shown by
affidavit or otherwise, the clerk must enter the party’s default.” Prior to directing the Clerk to
enter a default, however, the Court must first determine whether Plaintiff properly effectuated
service of process. Chambers v. Halsted Fin. Servs., LLC, 2:13-cv-809-FTM-38, 2014 WL
3721209, at *1 (M.D. Fla. July 28, 2014). Plaintiff has the burden of establishing effective
service of process. See Zamperla, Inc. v. S.B.F. S.R.L, No. 6:13-cv-1811-Orl-37KRS, 2014 WL
1400641, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Apr. 10, 2014).

Service on an individual may be effectuated by “delivering a copy of the summons and of
the complaint to the individual personally.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e)(2)(A). In this instance, the
Proof of Service states that Defendant was personally served with a copy of the summons. (Doc.
34 at 2). Additionally, the Affidavit in Support states that service of process was had on
Defendant Syed Ali personally. (Doc. 35-1 at 1). By personally serving Defendant Syed Ali, the
Court finds that service was properly effectuated. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e)(2)(A). Additionally,
Defendant has failed to file any documents in this case or otherwise defend this action as
required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Therefore, an entry of default by the Clerk of Court is
appropriate against Defendant Syed Ali.
Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS that:
1) Plaintiff’s Request for Entry of Default against Defendant Syed Ali (Doc. 35) is
GRANTED.
2) The Clerk of Court is directed to enter a default against Defendant Syed Ali.
DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on May 24, 2017.

Copies furnished to:
Counsel of Record
Unrepresented Parties

2