Stubbs et al v. Riverside Bank of the Gulf Coast et al

Filing 8

ORDER denying 6 Plaintiffs' Amended Motion to Intervene. Plaintiffs may file an amended complaint on or before November 18, 2016. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 11/3/2016. (LMF)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
FORT MYERS DIVISION
CEDRIC RAYNARD STUBBS and
DECHANTRA CATRECIA STUBBS,
Plaintiffs,
v.

Case No: 2:16-cv-762-FtM-99CM

RIVERSIDE BANK OF THE GULF
COAST, TIB BANK, FIRST
HORIZON HOME LOAN, FIRST
TENNESSEE HOME LOAN,
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC
REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.
(''MERS''), SETERUS, FANNIE MAE,
JANE DOES and JOHN DOES,
Defendants.
/
ORDER1
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Amended Motion to Intervene
(Doc. #6) filed on October 27, 2016. On October 14, 2016, the Court entered an Order
dismissing Plaintiffs’ pro se Complaint (Doc. #1) without prejudice for lack of subject
matter jurisdiction and allowed Plaintiffs the opportunity to amend. (Doc. #3). Instead of
filing an amended complaint, Plaintiffs filed this instant motion. Instead of construing the
motion as an amended complaint, in an abundance of caution the Court will allow Plaintiffs
additional time to file an amended complaint in accordance with the Court’s October 14,

1

Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or websites. These
hyperlinks are provided only for users’ convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in
CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other websites, this Court does not endorse,
recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their
websites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their websites. The
Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a
hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court.

2016 Order. When doing so, Plaintiffs should title the document “amended complaint”
and include allegations in accordance with this Court’s October 14, 2016 Order. Plaintiffs
are warned that failure to do so will result in dismissal of this case.
Accordingly, it is now
ORDERED:
(1) Plaintiffs’ Amended Motion to Intervene (Doc. #6) is DENIED.
(2) Plaintiffs may file an amended complaint on or before November 18, 2016.
DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida this 3rd day of November, 2016.

Copies: All Parties of Record

2