Prada et al v. DCS Enterprises, Inc. et al

Filing 54

ORDER adopting 51 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 50 Joint MOTION for Settlement Approval of Settlements Between Plaintiffs Green and Lockwood and the DefendantsJoint MOTION to Dismiss Claims of Plaintiffs' Lockwood and Green With Prejudice . The Report and Recommendation 51 is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED and the findings incorporated herein. The Joint Motion for Approval of Settlements and Dismissal with Prejudice 50 is GRANTED and the Settlement Agreements (Doc. 50- 1; Doc. 50-2) are APPROVED as a fair and reasonable resolution of the bona fide FLSA dispute. The Court DISMISSES with prejudice all claims asserted by Plaintiffs Kristy Lockwood and Demetric Green. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment accordingly and terminate Plaintiffs Kristy Lockwood and Demetric Green from the case file.Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 9/1/2017. (LMF)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION VANESSA PRADA, KRISTY LOCKWOOD, DEMETRIC GREEN and JIMMY WALKER, Plaintiffs, v. Case No: 2:16-cv-850-FtM-38CM DCS ENTERPRISES, INC., DAVID STEWART and SUE STEWART, Defendants. / OPINION AND ORDER1 This matter comes before the Court on United States Magistrate Judge Carol Mirando’s Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 51). Judge Mirando recommends granting the Joint Motion for Approval of Settlements and Dismissal with Prejudice (Doc. 50) filed by Plaintiffs Kristy Lockwood and Demetric Green and Defendants DCS Enterprises, Inc., David Stewart, and Sue Stewart.2 The recommendation also includes approving the Settlement Agreements (Doc. 50-1; Doc. 50-2) as a fair and reasonable 1 Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or websites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users’ convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other websites, this Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their websites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their websites. The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court. 2 Plaintiffs Jimmy Walker and Vanessa Prada are proceeding pro se and did not join in this motion. (Doc. 50 at 1 n.1). resolution of a bona fide dispute under the Fair Labor Standards Act. Because the parties do not object to the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 53), this matter is ripe for review. A district judge “may accept, reject, or modify in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The district judge “shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” Id. And “[t]he judge may also receive further evidence or recommit the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions.” Id. After examining the file carefully and independently, and upon considering Judge Mirando’s findings and recommendations, the Court accepts and adopts the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: (1) The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 51) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED and the findings incorporated herein. (2) The Joint Motion for Approval of Settlements and Dismissal with Prejudice (Doc. 50) is GRANTED and the Settlement Agreements (Doc. 50-1; Doc. 502) are APPROVED as a fair and reasonable resolution of the bona fide FLSA dispute. (3) The Court DISMISSES with prejudice all claims asserted by Plaintiffs Kristy Lockwood and Demetric Green. (4) The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment accordingly and terminate Plaintiffs Kristy Lockwood and Demetric Green from the case file. 2 DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida this 1st day of September 2017. Copies: All Parties of Record 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?