Prada et al v. DCS Enterprises, Inc. et al
Filing
54
ORDER adopting 51 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 50 Joint MOTION for Settlement Approval of Settlements Between Plaintiffs Green and Lockwood and the DefendantsJoint MOTION to Dismiss Claims of Plaintiffs' Lockwood and Green With Prejudice . The Report and Recommendation 51 is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED and the findings incorporated herein. The Joint Motion for Approval of Settlements and Dismissal with Prejudice 50 is GRANTED and the Settlement Agreements (Doc. 50- 1; Doc. 50-2) are APPROVED as a fair and reasonable resolution of the bona fide FLSA dispute. The Court DISMISSES with prejudice all claims asserted by Plaintiffs Kristy Lockwood and Demetric Green. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment accordingly and terminate Plaintiffs Kristy Lockwood and Demetric Green from the case file.Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 9/1/2017. (LMF)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
FORT MYERS DIVISION
VANESSA PRADA, KRISTY
LOCKWOOD, DEMETRIC GREEN and
JIMMY WALKER,
Plaintiffs,
v.
Case No: 2:16-cv-850-FtM-38CM
DCS ENTERPRISES, INC., DAVID
STEWART and SUE STEWART,
Defendants.
/
OPINION AND ORDER1
This matter comes before the Court on United States Magistrate Judge Carol
Mirando’s Report and Recommendation.
(Doc. 51).
Judge Mirando recommends
granting the Joint Motion for Approval of Settlements and Dismissal with Prejudice (Doc.
50) filed by Plaintiffs Kristy Lockwood and Demetric Green and Defendants DCS
Enterprises, Inc., David Stewart, and Sue Stewart.2 The recommendation also includes
approving the Settlement Agreements (Doc. 50-1; Doc. 50-2) as a fair and reasonable
1
Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or
websites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users’ convenience. Users are
cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By
allowing hyperlinks to other websites, this Court does not endorse, recommend, approve,
or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their websites.
Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their websites.
The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink.
Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does
not affect the opinion of the Court.
2
Plaintiffs Jimmy Walker and Vanessa Prada are proceeding pro se and did not join in
this motion. (Doc. 50 at 1 n.1).
resolution of a bona fide dispute under the Fair Labor Standards Act. Because the parties
do not object to the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 53), this matter is ripe for review.
A district judge “may accept, reject, or modify in whole or in part, the findings or
recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The district
judge “shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified
proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” Id. And “[t]he judge
may also receive further evidence or recommit the matter to the magistrate judge with
instructions.” Id.
After examining the file carefully and independently, and upon considering Judge
Mirando’s findings and recommendations, the Court accepts and adopts the Report and
Recommendation.
Accordingly, it is now
ORDERED:
(1) The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 51) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED
and the findings incorporated herein.
(2) The Joint Motion for Approval of Settlements and Dismissal with Prejudice
(Doc. 50) is GRANTED and the Settlement Agreements (Doc. 50-1; Doc. 502) are APPROVED as a fair and reasonable resolution of the bona fide FLSA
dispute.
(3) The Court DISMISSES with prejudice all claims asserted by Plaintiffs Kristy
Lockwood and Demetric Green.
(4) The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment accordingly and terminate
Plaintiffs Kristy Lockwood and Demetric Green from the case file.
2
DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida this 1st day of September 2017.
Copies: All Parties of Record
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?