Robinson v. Section 23 Property Owner's Association, Inc. et al

Filing 18

ORDER adopting 17 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Complaint filed by Albert Robinson. The Report and Recommendation 17 is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED and the findings incorporated herein. The above-captioned case is DISMISSED.The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment accordingly, terminate any pending deadlines, and close the file. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 8/28/2017. (LMF)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION ALBERT ROBINSON, Plaintiff, v. Case No: 2:16-cv-888-FtM-38CM SECTION 23 PROPERTY OWNER’S ASSOCIATION, INC., SECTION 23, PROPERTY OWNER’S ASSOCIATION, INC., JUDGE LISE MARIE SPADER PORTER, JUDGE JOHN LEO BURNS, DAVID KEITH OAKS, DAVID K. OAKS P.A. and DAVID K. OAKS TRUST, Defendants. / OPINION AND ORDER1 This matter comes before the Court on United States Magistrate Judge Carol Mirando’s Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 17). Judge Mirando recommends dismissing pro se Plaintiff Albert Robinson’s Complaint for failure to comply with the Court’s orders, failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915, and failure to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. 17). No party has filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to do so has expired. 1 Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or websites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users’ convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other websites, this Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their websites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their websites. The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court. A district judge “may accept, reject, or modify in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The district judge “shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” Id. And “[t]he judge may also receive further evidence or recommit the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions.” Id. After examining the file carefully and independently, and upon considering Judge Mirando’s findings and recommendations, the Court accepts and adopts the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 17) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED and the findings incorporated herein. 2. The above-captioned case is DISMISSED. 3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment accordingly, terminate any pending deadlines, and close the file. DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida this 28th day of August 2017. Copies: All Parties of Record 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?