Collier County v. Holiday CVS, L.L.C. et al
Filing
63
ORDER adopting 62 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 55 Second MOTION for Attorney Fees and Incorporated Memorandum of Law filed by RTG, LLC, 59 MOTION for Attorney Fees filed by RTG, LLC. United States Magistrate Judge Carol M irando's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 62 ) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED and the findings incorporated herein. Defendant RTG LLC's Motion for Attorneys' Fees (Doc. 55 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Court awards RTG $ 126,495.00 in attorneys' fees. Appellee RTG, LLC's Motion for Attorneys' Fees (Doc. 59 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Court awards RTG $36,007.50 in attorneys' fees. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter an amended judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 10/25/2018. (LMF)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
FORT MYERS DIVISION
COLLIER COUNTY, a political
subdivision of the State of Florida
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No: 2:17-cv-14-FtM-38CM
RTG, LLC,
Defendants.
/
ORDER1
Before the Court is United States Magistrate Judge Carol Mirando’s Report and
Recommendation. (Doc. 62). Judge Mirando recommends granting in part and denying
in part Defendant RTG LLC’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees (Doc. 55) and granting in part
and denying in part Appellee RTG LLC’s Motion for Attorneys Fees (Doc. 59). No party
objects to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to do so has expired.
A district judge “may accept, reject, or modify in whole or in part, the findings or
recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The district
judge “shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified
proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” Id. And “[t]he judge
1
Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or websites. These
hyperlinks are provided only for users’ convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in
CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other websites, this Court does not endorse,
recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their
websites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their websites. The
Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a
hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court.
may also receive further evidence or recommit the matter to the magistrate judge with
instructions.” Id.
After examining the file independently, and upon considering Judge Mirando’s
findings and recommendations, the Court accepts and adopts the Report and
Recommendation.
Accordingly, it is now
ORDERED:
(1) United States Magistrate Judge Carol Mirando’s Report and Recommendation
(Doc. 62) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED and the findings incorporated herein.
(2) Defendant RTG LLC’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees (Doc. 55) is GRANTED in
part and DENIED in part. The Court awards RTG $126,495.00 in attorneys’
fees.
(3) Appellee RTG, LLC’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees (Doc. 59) is GRANTED in
part and DENIED in part. The Court awards RTG $36,007.50 in attorneys’
fees.
(4) The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter an amended judgment accordingly.
DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida this 25th day of October 2018.
Copies: All Parties of Record
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?