Dorsely v. Gonzalez
Filing
31
ORDER granting 28 Plaintiff's Motion to Add Parties and for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint. The Clerk is directed to docket the Second Amended Complaint for Damages, Costs of Litigation and Attorney's Fee (Doc. 28-1) as a separate docket entry. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carol Mirando on 6/21/2017. (HJ)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
FORT MYERS DIVISION
MITIL DORSELI,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No: 2:17-cv-37-FtM-99CM
GREGORIO GONZALEZ, JR.,
Defendant.
ORDER
This matter comes before the Court upon review of Plaintiff’s Motion to Add
Parties and for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 28) filed on June 6,
2017.
Plaintiff seeks to file a second amended complaint joining three additional
plaintiffs, Rene Joltius, Nerius Joltius, and Gelicilia Thelemarc, and two additional
defendants, Gregorio Gonzalez, Sr. and GSH Labor Management, Inc., to this action.
Doc. 28 at 1.
Although Plaintiff states that Defendant opposes joining three new
plaintiffs, Defendant has not filed a response in opposition, and Defendant’s time to
do so has expired.
Id. at 4-5.
Defendant’s non-response to the present motion
creates a presumption that the motion is unopposed.
Great Am. Assur. Co. v.
Sanchuk, LLC, No. 8:10-cv-2568-T-33AEP, 2012 WL 195526, at *3 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 23,
2012).
Rule 20 of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that individuals may join
as plaintiffs if, “they assert any right to relief jointly, severally, or in the alternative
with respect to or arising out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of
transactions or occurrences; and any question of law or fact common to all plaintiffs
will arise in the action.”
Fed. R. Civ. P. 20(a).
This rule seeks to “promote trial
convenience and expedite the resolution of disputes, thereby eliminating unnecessary
lawsuits.”
Brandywine Commc’ns Techs., LLC v. Verizon Commc’ns, Inc., No. 6:11-
cv-1344-Orl-36DAB, 2012 WL 527536, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 12, 2012) (citing
Alexander v. Fulton County, 207 F.3d 1303, 1323 (11th Cir. 2003)).
Here, Plaintiff argues that three new plaintiffs are likely to file individual
lawsuits, asserting claims nearly identical to ones raised in this case.
3.
Doc. 28 at 2-
Plaintiff also claims that he and the new plaintiffs seek the same relief and rely
on the same witnesses and evidence.
Id. at 3. Furthermore, Plaintiff argues that
a new defendant, Gregorio Gonzalez, Sr., is the father of Defendant and operated
GSH Labor Management, Inc. with Defendant.
Id. Based on the above allegations,
the Court will grant the requested joinder.
Plaintiffs also seek leave to file a second amended complaint to join the
additional parties. Doc. 28 at 1.
Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
provides that, for amendments not filed as a matter of course, “a party may amend
its pleading only with the opposing party’s written consent or the court’s leave.
court should freely give leave when justice so requires.”
The
Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2).
“Although leave to amend shall be freely given when justice so requires, a motion to
amend may be denied on numerous grounds such as undue delay, undue prejudice to
the defendants, and futility of the amendment.”
-2-
Maynard v. Bd. of Regents of the
Div. of Univs. of the Fla. Dep’t of Educ. ex rel. Univ. of S. Fla., 342 F.3d 1281, 1287
(11th Cir. 2003) (internal quotation marks omitted).
Here, upon review of the motion and the proposed Second Amended Complaint
for Damages, Costs of Litigation and Attorney’s Fee (Doc. 28-1), the Court finds that
good cause exists, and neither ground justifying a denial of leave to amend is present.
See id. Furthermore, Defendant did not file an opposition to the requested relief,
and Plaintiff filed the present motion within the Court-ordered deadline of June 12,
2017 to file motions to amend the pleadings.
Doc. 30 at 1.
ACCORDINGLY, it is hereby
ORDERED:
1.
Plaintiff’s Motion to Add Parties and for Leave to File Second Amended
Complaint (Doc. 28) is GRANTED.
2.
The Clerk is directed to docket the Second Amended Complaint for
Damages, Costs of Litigation and Attorney’s Fee (Doc. 28-1) as a separate docket
entry.
DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on this 21st day of June, 2017.
Copies:
Counsel of record
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?