Losacano v. Anthony 57, Inc. et al
ORDER adopting 78 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 75 Joint MOTION for Settlement ApprovalJoint MOTION to Dismiss Only Plaintiffs Claims With Prejudice filed by Wynona Parr, Victoria Dull, Colleen Sanchez, Leigh Kundrick , Susan Julian, Danette Bed. The Report and Recommendation 78 is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED and the findings incorporated herein. The Joint Motion to Approve Mediated Settlement Agreement and to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Claims with Prejudice 75 is GRANTED. Plaintiffs' claims are DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 3/12/2018. (LMF)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
FORT MYERS DIVISION
LAURA LOSACANO, DANETTE
BEDERKA, LEIGH KUNDRICK,
COLLEEN SANCHEZ, VICTORIA
DULL, SUSAN JULIAN and WYNONA
PARR, on behalf of herself and other
employees similarly situated
Case No: 2:17-cv-84-FtM-38CM
ANTHONY 57, INC., ANTHONY
SERRAGO and SABAL SPRINGS
This matter comes before the Court on United States Magistrate Judge Carol
Mirando’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 78) on the Joint Motion to Approve
Mediated Settlement Agreement and to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Claims with Prejudice (Doc.
75). Plaintiffs Laura Losacano, Danette Bederka, Victoria Dull, Susan Julian, Leigh
Kundrick, Colleen Sanchez, and Wynona Parr (collectively “Plaintiffs”) and Defendant
Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or
websites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users’ convenience. Users are
cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By
allowing hyperlinks to other websites, this Court does not endorse, recommend, approve,
or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their websites.
Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their websites.
The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink.
Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does
not affect the opinion of the Court.
Sabal Springs Homeowners’ Association, Inc. filed a Joint Notice of Non-Objection (Doc.
79). This matter is now ripe for review.
After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and
recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject, or modify the magistrate judge's
report and recommendation. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Williams v. Wainwright,
681 F.2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982). Absent specific objections, there is no requirement that a
district judge review factual findings de novo, Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9
(11th Cir. 1993), and the court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the
findings and recommendations, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The district judge reviews legal
conclusions de novo, even absent an objection. See Cooper-Houston v. Southern Ry.
Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994).
After independently examining the file and on consideration of Judge Mirando’s
findings and recommendation, the Court accepts the Report and Recommendation.
Accordingly, it is now
(1) The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 78) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED
and the findings incorporated herein.
(2) The Joint Motion to Approve Mediated Settlement Agreement and to Dismiss
Plaintiffs’ Claims with Prejudice (Doc. 75) is GRANTED.
(3) Plaintiffs’ claims are DISMISSED with prejudice.
DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida this 9th day of March, 2018.
Copies: All Parties of Record
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?