Palm v. Mueller et al
Filing
10
OPINION AND ORDER adopting 9 Report and Recommendations; dismissing 1 Complaint without prejudice for failure to prosecute. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly, terminate all deadlines, and close the file. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 10/25/2017. (RKR)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
FORT MYERS DIVISION
CHARLOTTE BEA PALM,
Plaintiff,
v.
ROBERT SWAN MUELLER, III,
Former
Director
of
FBI,
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, Former
President
of
the
United
States, JOHN OWEN BRENNAN,
Former
Director
of
CIA,
PORTER JOHNSTON GOSS, Former
Director
of
CIA,
ERIC
HIMPTON HOLDER, JR., Former
U.S. Attorney General, JOHN
E.
STEELE,
US
District
Court, Middle District of
Florida,
ANITA
KELLY
ANDREWS, HSU, Associate of
Porter Goss, PATRICIA E.
ANDREWS, Trustee of Amethyst
Trust, MARK B. ANDREWS, JR.,
Associate of Porter Goss,
MARK F. HEARNE, II, Trustee
of
Pillar
Foundation,
AMETHYST
TRUST,
PILLAR
FOUNDATION, CHRISTOPHER A.
WRAY, Nominee for Director
of FBI, JAMES BRIEN COMEY,
Former
Director
of
FBI,
GEORGE W. BUSH, JR., Former
President
of
the
United
States, GEORGE JOHN TENET,
Former Director of CIA, JOHN
MARK DEUTCH, Former Director
of
CIA,
JIM
RONSINSKI,
Agent, FBI, ADAM WILKINSON,
US Marshal, MIKE J. SCOTT,
Sheriff
of
Lee
County,
Florida, KURT GRAF, Captain,
Case No:
2:17-cv-395-FtM-29CM
Cape
Coral
Police
Department, DANA COSTA, Cape
Coral
Police
Department,
STEPHEN BURKHART, Cape Coral
Police
Department,
JOHN
SZERLAG, City Manager of
Cape Coral, Florida, DAVID
NEWLAN, Chief of Police,
Cape
Coral
Police
Department,
LISA
BARNES,
Deputy Chief, Cape Coral
Police
Department,
CAPE
CORAL POLICE DEPARTMENT, LEE
COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE, LEE
HEALTH SYSTEM, SALUSCARE,
INC., JANICE L. STEPNOSKI,
Social Worker, THE UNITED
STATES
OF
AMERICA,
THE
FEDERAL
BUREAU
OF
INVESTIGATION, THE CENTRAL
INTELLIGENCE
AGENCY,
THE
UNITED
STATES
ARMED
SERVICES, and THE SUPREME
COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
OF AMERICA,
Defendants.
OPINION AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court on consideration of the
Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. #9), filed
October 4, 2017, recommending that the action be dismissed without
prejudice.
No objections have been filed and the time to do so
has expired.
After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings
and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject or modify
- 2 -
the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation.
636(b)(1);
28 U.S.C. §
Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982),
cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1112 (1983).
In the absence of specific
objections, there is no requirement that a district judge review
factual findings de novo, Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9
(11th Cir. 1993), and the court may accept, reject or modify, in
whole or in part, the findings and recommendations.
636(b)(1).
28 U.S.C. §
The district judge reviews legal conclusions de novo,
even in the absence of an objection.
See Cooper-Houston v.
Southern Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994); Castro
Bobadilla v. Reno, 826 F. Supp. 1428, 1431-32 (S.D. Fla. 1993),
aff’d, 28 F.3d 116 (11th Cir. 1994) (Table).
After repeatedly failing to respond to the Magistrate Judge’s
Orders, it is recommended that the case be dismissed.
After
conducting an independent examination of the file and upon due
consideration of the Report and Recommendation, the Court accepts
the Report and Recommendation of the magistrate judge.
Accordingly, it is now
ORDERED:
1.
The
Report
and
Recommendation
(Doc.
#9)
is
hereby
adopted and the findings incorporated herein.
2.
Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. #1) is DISMISSED without
prejudice for failure to prosecute.
- 3 -
3.
The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly, terminate
all pending motions and deadlines, and close the file.
DONE and ORDERED at Fort Myers, Florida, this
of October, 2017.
Copies:
Hon. Carol Mirando
United States Magistrate Judge
Counsel of Record
Unrepresented parties
- 4 -
25th
day
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?