Southern-Owners Insurance Company v. MAC Contractors of Florida, LLC et al

Filing 172

ORDER terminating 158 Motion for Attorney Fees; terminating 159 Motion for Supplemental Relief; granting 169 Motion to defer rulings pending appeal. The motions are terminated until due to be reopened. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 6/21/2023. (RKR)

Download PDF
Case 2:18-cv-00021-JES-KCD Document 172 Filed 06/21/23 Page 1 of 3 PageID 4968 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION SOUTHERN-OWNERS COMPANY, INSURANCE Plaintiff, v. Case No: 2:18-cv-21-JES-KCD MAC CONTRACTORS OF FLORIDA, LLC, PAUL S. DOPPELT, Trustee of Paul S. Doppelt Revocable Trust dated 12/08/90, and DEBORAH A. DOPPELT, Trustee of Deborah A. Doppelt Revocable Trust dated 12/08/90, Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER This matter comes before the Court on plaintiff's Motion to Defer Rulings on MAC Contractors/KJIMS' Pending Motions (Doc. #169) filed on April 27, 2023. Defendant filed a Motion in Opposition (Doc. #170) on May 2, 2023. Specifically, plaintiff seeks to defer consideration of the Motion for Entitlement to Attorneys’ Fees and Costs, Renewed Application for Appellate Attorneys’ Fees, and Response to Order Dated March 30, 2023 (Doc. #158) and Motion for Supplemental Relief (Doc. #159) while an appeal remains pending. In response, MAC Contractors indicates that it agrees to the stay of its Motion for Supplemental Relief pending appeal. Further, defendant also Case 2:18-cv-00021-JES-KCD Document 172 Filed 06/21/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID 4969 agreed to a stay of the first motion “upon the condition that Southern-Owners stipulate to entitlement as to a certain date (it was suggested the date of the order on the motion for summary judgment or entitlement a date would be prejudgment interest. after the decided)” order for as to when purposes (Doc. #170, p. 2.) of we thought calculating Defendant argues that, under Florida law, “prejudgment interest begins to accrue on ‘the date the entitlement to attorney fees [and] is fixed through agreement, arbitration award, or court determination.’ Butler v. Yusem, 3 So. 3d 1185, 1186 (Fla. 2009) (citing Quality Eng'd Installation, Inc. v. Higley S. Inc., 670 So. 2d 929, 930–31 (Fla. 1996).” “A (Id., p. 6.) prevailing party is entitled, under Florida law, to prejudgment interest. [] Prejudgment interest is, by definition, interest that accrues until judgment is rendered.” Bel-Bel Int'l Corp. v. Cmty. Bank of Homestead, 162 F.3d 1101, 1110 (11th Cir. 1998). See also Argonaut Ins. Co. v. May Plumbing Co., 474 So. 2d 212, 214 (Fla. 1985) (“Florida has adopted the position that prejudgment interest is merely another element of pecuniary damages.”). “[P]rejudgment interest accrues until the date of the judgment after which postjudgment interest begins to accrue.” SEB S.A. v. Sunbeam Corp., 476 F.3d 1317, 1321 (11th Cir. 2007). The prejudgment interest is not dependent on the filing of the motion for entitlement or when the decision is rendered as to entitlement. - 2 - Case 2:18-cv-00021-JES-KCD Document 172 Filed 06/21/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID 4970 “Florida law does not allow for a gap in the award of prejudgment and postjudgment interest.” SEB S.A., 476 F.3d at 1320 (citing Bel-Bel Int’l Corp. at 1110-11). The Court will defer the decision on both motions until the appeal is resolved and finds no prejudice to defendant. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED: Plaintiff's Motion to Defer Rulings on KJIMS' Pending Motions (Doc. #169) is GRANTED. The Court will defer ruling on the Motion for Entitlement to Attorneys’ Fees and Costs, Renewed Application for Appellate Attorneys’ Fees, and Response to Order Dated March 30, 2023 (Doc. #158) and Motion for Supplemental Relief (Doc. #159) pending appeal. The Clerk shall terminate these motions until such time as the appeal is resolved and the motions may be reopened. DONE and ORDERED at Fort Myers, Florida, this of June 2023. Copies: Counsel of Record - 3 - 21st day

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?