Miller et al v. The City of Fort Myers et al

Filing 46

ORDER denying without prejudice 18 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. The parties must file a status update on settlement on or before December 3, 2018. Defendants must file an answer or renewed response to the Amended Complaint on or before December 17, 2018. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 10/24/2018. (LMF)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION DERETHA MILLER, LUETRICIA FREEMAN BECKER, RALPH HENRY, NOEMY RODRIGUEZ and TAMBITHA BANKS, individually, and on behalf of a class of persons similarly situated Plaintiffs, v. Case No: 2:18-cv-195-FtM-38CM THE CITY OF FORT MYERS, RANDALL P. HENDERSON, JR. and SAEED KAZEMI, Defendants. / ORDER1 Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Notice of Status of Settlement Negotiations. (Doc. 45). The parties have potentially resolved Plaintiffs’ Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”) claims,2 while Plaintiffs’ other six claims remain pending. The parties are finalizing an acceptable settlement agreement. They hope to have the agreement finalized within the next thirty days. 1 Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or websites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users’ convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other websites, this Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their websites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their websites. The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court. 2 Counts 1 and 2 in the Amended Complaint. (Doc. 14). Before the Court is also Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss one of Plaintiffs’ RCRA claims. (Doc. 18). Because the parties have potentially resolved Plaintiffs’ RCRA claims, the Court denies without prejudice Defendants’ motion. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 1 (stating the rules should secure a “just, speedy, and inexpensive determination” of this action). This will preserve judicial resources in not addressing claims and arguments that have been resolved. It will also give the parties the opportunity to finalize their settlement agreement and narrow the focus of their dispute. Defendants may then file a renewed motion to dismiss or an answer to the Amended Complaint. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: 1. The parties must file a status update on settlement on or before December 3, 2018. 2. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 18) is DENIED without prejudice. 3. Defendants must file an answer or renewed response to the Amended Complaint on or before December 17, 2018. DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida this 24th day of October 2018. Copies: All Parties of Record 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?